About The Death Penalty

The death penalty has been a method used as far back as the Eighteenth century B.C. The use of the death penalty was for punishing people for committing relentless crimes. The severity of the punishment were much more inferior in comparison to modern day. These inferior punishments included boiling live bodies, burning at the stake, hanging, and extensive use of the guillotine to decapitate criminals. In the ancient days no laws were established to dictate and regulate the type of punishment someone would receive. People who commited small-scale crimes, such as larceny and arson and those who committed large-scale crimes such as murder, suicide, perjury, etc were both punished equally using the death penalty. In the ancient days when the death penalty was used, those who used it were at a disadvantage of having jail cells and prisons. However, in modern day we should entirely rid our governmental system of allowing the death penalty because it is a crime against humanity itself and extremely overbearing and barbaric to those who commit crimes and are punished.

The controversy of diminishing or keeping the death penalty in the United States continues to this day. Thirty states, including Florida, Virginia, and Texas continue to legalize the use of the death penalty. However, twenty states refuse to utilize it and have banned it (“States with and without the death penalty”). Many people have their own opinions on whether it should be used. For example, the criminal justice system believes that it should be utilized but, the public opposes this and believes it should not. The death penalty should not be employed because it costs about 90,000 dollars more to execute someone in comparison to imprisoning the inmate (“Financial facts about the death penalty”). The taxpayers in some of the supporting states pay thousands of tax dollars to have someone executed in comparison to a cheaper alternative which is imprisonment. This incentivizes these inmates to think about the crime they had committed instead of ending their lives. In addition to this, the use of the death penalty goes against the 8th amendment which prohibits cruel and unusual punishments and denotes excessive bail for criminals. This was put in place to assure discrimination did not take part in the verdict. Statistics show that most people who face the death penalty come from low class families who reside in low-income neighborhoods. These people are more prone to committing crimes to make money for personal familial afflictions that they face on a day to day basis. Racism and bribery have also been a major problem as well because people of upper class, richer families have been reported of paying judges to give poor minorities harsher punishment because of the effect the perpetrators actions had on the richer families. In today’s society, most people who suffer from the death penalty are Native Americans, blacks, and immigrants which shows the injustice and racism being used against these groups.

Our writers can help you with any type of essay. For any subject

Order now

The people who are accused of crimes are not always guilty. An innocent man was charged as a criminal sentenced to twenty years of imprisonment. He was in the process of potentially receiving the death penalty, however, he was a model inmate so they decided not to be intemperate of using the death penalty. Twenty years later, as technology further advanced, they performed a DNA test and came to the conclusion that he was not the perpetrator and set him free. This exploits the wrongful doings that occur when the government utilizes the death penalty. Researchers have calculated the percent error that has amounted of prisoners who have been sentenced to death. They have also come to the conclusion that 4.1% (Death penalty information center”). Although this may not seem a lot, 4.1% is a huge margin when taken into account the amount of prisoners in these facilities. The use of the death penalty will have no severe effect on the number of crimes committed. Although a prisoner may have committed a crime, this doesn’t mean that they don’t have any sympathy for what they did. Many prisoners after serving time turn their whole world around, and become model citizens. In today’s society, this may be hard because people never forget the things a person may or may not have done, but they try their best to fit into society again.

On the other hand, many believe that the death penalty should be used. They believe that the criminal should be punished to the fullest extent of the law. Having the possibility of the prisoner breaking out and striking again is not a risk they’re willing to take, so they believe that killing the prisoner is better and less risky. Many victims who have survived the actions of the perpetrator or know a loved one who has been through a murder or crime believe that the criminal should be killed because they experienced it first hand and went through the emotional trauma that the criminal caused. Many of these people let emotion take over their beliefs by skewing in one direction due to the impact a criminal might have had. Also, people believe that it will decrease the rate of crime by scaring other potential criminals from committing a crime, however, there is no evidence to support this theory. Also, people believe that advances in technology will reduce the amount of people wrongfully accused, so their death won’t create controversy about whether they have the right person. They believe that the person should not have commited the crime if they did not want to deal with the consequences of their actions. Giving up the death penalty would mean giving up justice for the families affected and not giving them the closure they deserve. Immanuel Kant said, “A society that is not willing to demand a life of somebody who has taken somebody else’s life is simply immoral.” (Kozinski, “Should the death penalty be allowed”). Many people agree with him and believe in the saying, “an eye for an eye”. Hence, these are the reasons why people believe the death penalty should be used.

Countries in the middle east are aggressive when it comes to the death penalty and use it more harshly than the United States. A few months ago, two rapists were hung in a public area after raping a 10 year old girl in Pakistan. The government there believed that by hanging him in a public manner, people would be scared to commit the same crime. There is no evidence that shows public executions being factors that decrease the amount of crimes committed (“Introduction to the death penalty”). The country with the most executions is China with over 1000 executions in 2017 (“The death penalty: An international perspective”). The United States learned about the death penalty when colonizers settled here and brought their ideas with them. The first recorded execution in America took place in 1608 involving a spy from Spain. Different colonies had different laws regarding the use and severity of the death penalty. Many abolitionists were against the use of death as a punishment and felt that there was no justification for a state to take a life.

Aforementioned, the use of the death penalty continuously separates families and overall causes criminals to ultimately be put to death instead of feeling the after effects of the crime they had committed. The death penalty violates the 8th amendment along with being considered cruel and unusual. Even criminals do not deserve severe punishments like the death penalty to amount for the crime that has been committed. Equal protection under the law is violated when the death penalty is utilized to conform to crimes committed by criminals. The death penalty should be diminished so that limited resources and the violation of equal protection under the law is not infringed upon. Although it may never be truly justified, death penalty remains an active part of American society in various states and we can only hope the decisions made in court are viable because the death penalty is irreversible and barbaric.

Gun Control Is Not The Answer

There is no need for gun control because really not that many people are killed by guns. “Americans were 21.5 times more likely to die of heart disease; 18.7 times more likely to die of malignant tumors; and 2.4 times more likely to die of diabetes or 2.3 times more likely to die of Alzheimer’s than to die from a firearm” (Gun Control – ProCon.org.). America’s widespread gun culture stems in part from its colonial history, revolutionary roots, frontier expansion, and the Second Amendment. Gun control goes against the concept of a democracy that allows the people the right to defend themselves. The reasons that I think gun control is unnecessary is because gun control laws violate the right to self-defense and deny people a sense of safety. Also gun control laws will not stop criminals from getting guns or breaking laws. Lastly, education about guns and gun safety is needed to stop gun deaths.

The first reason that we should not have gun control is that it violates the right to self defense. “Nelson Lund, JD, PhD, Professor at George Mason University School of Law, stated, “The right to self-defense and to the means of defending oneself is a basic natural right that grows out of the right to life” and “many [gun control laws] interfere with the ability of law-abiding citizens to defend themselves against violent criminals” (Nelson Lund). Criminals are more likely to avoid crimes if they know that the person they were going to act upon was armed. Where they would most likely commit a crime would be a gun free zone where nobody can defend themselves. Therefore this proves my reasoning on self defense.

Our writers can help you with any type of essay. For any subject

Order now

The second reason that we should not have gun control because Gun control laws will not prevent criminals from getting the guns or breaking laws. “Despite Chicago’s ban on gun shops, shooting ranges, assault weapons, and high capacity magazines, in 2014 Chicago had 2,089 shooting victims including at least 390 murders. Approximately 50,000 guns were recovered by police in Chicago between 2001 and Mar. 2012. The guns came from all 50 states, and more than half came from outside of Illinois.” (Chicago Tribune). Gun laws would stop a felon or criminal from going into a store and purchasing a firearm. But instead, how they get them is from stealing the firearms from the ones who are able to get a gun legally. Then they turn around and sell the stolen firearms to others. Criminals will always be able to obtain guns illegally somehow or someway.

Works Cited

Bramucci, Steve. “Want Gun Control? You’d Better Understand These Pro-Gun Arguments.” UPROXX, UPROXX, 22 Aug. 2018, uproxx.com/news/arguments-against-gun-control/.

“Gun Control – ProCon.org.” Gun Control – ProCon.org, gun-control.procon.org/.

Knighton, Tom. “How Do Criminals Get Guns Despite Gun Laws? This Is One Way.” Bearing Arms, Bearing Arms, 24 July 2018, bearingarms.com/tom-k/2018/07/24/criminals-get-guns-despite-gun-laws-one-way/.

Mitchell, Travis. “Gun Policy.” Pew Research Center, Pew Research Center, 18 Oct. 2018, www.pewresearch.org/topics/gun-policy/.

Nelson Lund, “The Second Amendment and the Inalienable Right to Self-Defense,” www.heritage.org, Apr. 17, 2014

Chicago Tribune, “Chicago Shooting Victims,” www.crime.chicagotribune.com, Feb. 10, 2015      

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

× How can I help you?