Abortion is perhaps one of the most fundamental issues in history. Women have a choice to either go through with the pregnancy or terminate it. Under no circumstance should abortion be used as a form of birth control. In 1973, the Supreme Court decided that:
1) During the first trimester, a woman cannot be limited on how or when she wants an abortion.
Order now
2) During the second trimester, the state’s interest is in the mother’s health and they can make reasonable suggestions on how or where it will take place.
3) During the third trimester, the state’s interest lies with the unborn child and may prohibit the abortion, unless there is immediate danger to the mother. In 1992, Ronald Reagan and George Bush requested the Supreme Court to reverse this decision. It was denied by a five-person majority rule. The ruling stated that the due process clauses of the constitution uphold a woman’s liberty to choose an abortion prior to viability. Those who are pro-choice agree with these protections on abortion. On the other hand, people like me who are pro-life do not agree with these circumstances. We believe in the rights and the future of unborn children. As a pro-life advocate, I will start by trying to make abortions illegal, unless in cases of rape or danger to the mother, in the state of Nevada.
Pro-life can be defined as conservative in some ways, as the main focus is the preservation of human beings. They also support strict limits on abortion. Although liberals focus on humanity, this focus includes materialism, the process of illumination, and human nature. To define conservatism: they believe that a limited government will ensure order, a competitive market, and personal opportunity. They also advocate for change in moderation. In contrast to liberals, conservatives want to keep the government small except in matters of national defense. Despite taking a passive look at human nature, conservatives believe in strong leadership institutions, firm laws, and strict moral codes to maintain control in our society. They believe that people should solve their own problems, as they often result from their own mistakes.
Being pro-life often aligns one with the Republican party. The Republican party was born in the early 1850s by anti-slavery activists and individuals who believed that the government should grant the western lands to settlers free of charge. The party ascended to the national stage in 1856, although it was initially considered a third party, alongside the Democrats and Whigs. Abraham Lincoln was the first Republican to win the White House. Republicans initially referred to themselves as the gallant old party or G.O.P., but are now commonly called the grand old party. The party’s interests encompass various spheres, such as education and opportunity. This aligns with their focus on ensuring that children receive the best possible education, aiming at the highest achievements. Republicans place a high value on literacy and aim to support children in their education, healthcare, and safety. They also advocate for strengthening families and communities. They promote households with both parents present but also support single mothers through initiatives like Second Chance Maternity Homes to help avoid poverty. For Republicans, having both parents in the household ensures stability. The party also has interests in safeguarding individual rights within a free society, proscribing discrimination based on race, color, creed, religion, age, or disability. These factors should not, they emphasize, interfere with one’s educational opportunities, employment, or access to any establishments. Some Republicans are pro-life supporters and work towards making abortion illegal for the most part.
Creating or altering a law is a complex process rather than a straightforward task. Since Congress is responsible for crafting laws, all branches of government are involved. The legislative branch passes the law, the judicial branch interprets it, and the executive branch enforces it. Before the President signs a bill into law, it must be approved by both houses, signed by the Speaker and the Vice President. If the President vetoes it, the bill cannot become law unless it is passed again by a two-thirds majority vote from both houses. For someone looking to influence this process, forming or joining an interest group—those with common interests who seek to influence government policy—would be a smart first step. Understanding both sides of debates, such as pro-choice and pro-life, can help influence others to think more critically about these issues.
To this end, I plan to keep abreast of developments by watching the news and reading about both viewpoints as much as possible. I will then create a petition to present to Congress, aiming to gather signatures not just from pro-life supporters, but also from those who are pro-choice. We will work to create support groups for women who feel they have no other options, transforming small local groups into a nationwide movement that eventually captures media attention. By strategically positioning our cause to the media, we can empower pro-life advocates and potentially change the perspectives of those who were pro-choice or undecided. Small changes can indeed have a significant impact on society. I believe that making abortion illegal in Nevada, except under specific circumstances, will influence other states’ legislative decisions. It may also lead to more preventive practices such as increased use of birth control and condoms, thereby reducing the prevalence of STDs and teenage pregnancies. With less choice to terminate unintended pregnancies, people might become more proactive in preventing them. One simple change can potentially lead to a world of difference.
When a place considered natural, such as a forest, appears in an artistic work, its presence is rarely neutral. Nature is often used to represent something or is associated with certain connotations. These portrayals often expose the artist’s way of viewing nature, or his or her culture’s way of viewing it. One example of such a work is “Mr. Tambourine Man”, a 1965 folk song by the well-known singer-songwriter, Bob Dylan. The song’s only instruments, other than Dylan’s voice, are an acoustic guitar and a more lightly used electric guitar. Musically, the song has a quiet, calm sound. Like many other Bob Dylan songs, “Mr. Tambourine Man” has many lyrics; it has four verses and is about five and a half minutes long. In the lyrics, the narrator addresses a mysterious character, the eponymous Mr. Tambourine Man, and asks him to play a song. The narrator describes the fantastical adventures that he imagines having while following the Tambourine Man and listening to his song. The song includes mentions of natural landscapes that portray nature in a romanticized, escapist way.
In the first verse of “Mr. Tambourine Man”, the narrator says that “these ancient empty streets” are “too dead for dreaming”. This shows that he is in a city or town – a place of human civilization – and finds it unsatisfactory. The phrase “too dead for dreaming” is a clear indication that the narrator views this man-made place as lifeless and uninspiring, which foreshadows him finding more meaning in nature as the song goes on. The lyrics indeed touch on nature mainly in the later part of the song. This begins in the third verse, with the line, “and but for the sky there are no fences facing.” Since fences are man-made but the sky is natural, this line seems to indicate that the narrator and the Tambourine Man have escaped from the streets and gone to somewhere more natural. The line seems to draw a contrast between the man-made and the natural, as civilization is associated here with “fences”, which are limiting boundaries. The place evoked in this line – presumably a natural one – is expansive and free. In the eyes of the narrator, the natural world allows endless exploring and possibilities, which is certainly a romantic view of nature.
Order now
However, it is in the fourth verse that natural imagery appears most clearly, as the verse describes the narrator and the Tambourine Man going through a forest and to a beach. In it, the narrator asks the Tambourine Man to take him “down the foggy ruins of time, far past the frozen leaves”. Nature is often associated with the past and timelessness, and this seems to be done here. By walking past the leaves of this forest, the narrator imagines he is traveling back in time, as he sees this natural location as fixed and always having been this way. The mention that the leaves are “frozen”, if it does not just mean that the leaves are cold, may be a statement of this association; it could mean that the forest is unchanging, thus its leaves are “frozen” in time.
Next, the narrator refers to “the haunted, frightened trees”, which is one of the more ambiguous lines. One possibility is that it expresses the vulnerability of the natural forest, threatened by human activity. This makes the trees metaphorically fearful for their forest, perhaps implying an environmentalist viewpoint. The narrator then asks the Tambourine Man to take him “out to the windy beach, far from the twisted reach of crazy sorrows”. The beach here seems to be the landscape that the narrator romanticizes the most. The “crazy sorrows” line clearly shows that he views this (presumably natural) beach as a place free from suffering, expressing an escapist view of nature. Furthermore, this line reinforces the stereotype of the nature-culture binary suggesting that human strife occurs within society’s confines while nature, by contrast, is pristine and induces solely positive feelings. Even the word “out” before “to the windy beach” carries
connotations, characterizing the beach by its remoteness from human society. The narrator seems to associate this remoteness with his conception of the beach as a pure and untainted oasis.
The narrator reveals his intentions for the beach visit next: “Yes, to dance beneath the diamond sky with one hand waving free, silhouetted by the sea”, portraying the beach as bestowing a sense of unrestrained liberation. This liberating image recalls the “no fences facing” line in the third verse, associating nature with freedom as well as joy. The phrase “diamond sky” suggests that the sky at this location offers immense beauty and value. The reference to being “silhouetted by the sea” echoes a common trope in naturalistic art: the contemplation of human insignificance against a vast panorama, often used to associate nature with awe and wonder. Subsequently, the narrator plans to be “circled by the circus sands”. The sand’s comparison to a circus might seem ambiguous and unexpected amongst the verse’s otherwise tranquil language. However, it likely implies that the narrator regards the beach’s sand as a domain for jubilant expression, comparing his euphoria to the clamorous delight of a circus show.
After this, the narrator says that “all memory and fate” will be “driven deep beneath the waves”. If the waves of the ocean represent nature here, the line probably expresses the romantic view that nature is powerful. In this place, nature’s power and vastness overshadow everything, specifically the past (“memory”) and the future (“fate”). This indicates that the past and the future do not really matter on this beach, again implying that nature is timeless and changeless. The song’s final line, other than the last repetition of the chorus, is “let me forget about today until tomorrow”. When combined with the forest and beach imagery throughout the verse, this line seems to express an escapist view of nature, making natural locations seem like places without cares. It reinforces the nature-culture binary implied in the song; when the narrator is in society, he cannot “forget about the day-to-day difficulties of life”, but by traveling with the Tambourine Man through the forest and to the beach, he is able to let go of these superficial worries and lose himself in something more beautiful and transcendent. Overall, the lyrics to “Mr. Tambourine Man” paint a striking contrast between the “streets” of the first verse and the “forest” and “sky” of the fourth verse; the former are sad and meaningless, while the latter are expansive, timeless, serene, and pure—an escape from the troubles of life. Since the streets seem to represent society and humans in general, while the forest and beach seem to represent nature, the song reinforces the nature-culture or nature-human binary.
There doesn’t seem to be a middle ground; no place that has both natural and man-made elements is mentioned in the song, despite the abundance of such land in the real world. Throughout the song, nature could be said to represent many things, all of them positive: beauty, wonder, meaning, freedom, possibility, power, permanence, and simply happiness. Nature, and all its associations, are used to further the idea that the narrator is experiencing something meaningful – something outside and above the domain of everyday human experience – on his trip with the Tambourine Man. The song has a positive and emotionally-based view of nature-human entanglements, as the human narrator’s interaction with nature brings him respite (from strife and the sadness of the “streets”), inspiration (especially due to his belief that the landscape transcends time), and emotional liberation (shown by the dancing). Essentially, nature is used only as a romantic, symbolic backdrop for human emotions; aside from possibly the “haunted, frightened trees” line (which cannot even be interpreted with certainty), the issues that natural ecosystems themselves face are not alluded to.
Together, the references to natural landscapes in “Mr. Tambourine Man” celebrate nature and paint a very romanticized, idealistic picture of it. For the purposes of creating a good song, this is not necessarily a bad thing. It is certainly not wrong to appreciate natural ecosystems and hold them in high esteem. In fact, it is arguably a good thing, as humans need the services that ecosystems provide. Also, taking a romantic view of nature in a song or poem may enhance its aesthetic and emotional quality, as is the case in “Mr. Tambourine Man”. However, it is important to recognize that such one-sided, stereotypical conceptions of nature are not the whole truth at all. In reality, being in a natural location does not guarantee freedom. Natural environments change over time due to various factors and are not timeless, and of course, they do not necessarily exist apart from suffering. These environments also face issues and threats that romanticized portrayals often gloss over. Nature – itself an ambiguous word – is actually more complex than the simplistic depictions of it in art and culture, and this should be kept in mind when dealing with nature in the real world.
