I understand how difficult it is to see the difference between these two marvelous art styles! Lucky for you I’m here to help. What is most important for you to understand about these two complex artistic styles is that they’re both displaying the human figure. The difference between the two? How they represent it! Classical Greek style can be described as simple because of it’s emotionless and idealized state (93). The embodiment of these characterizations can be seen through the marble sculpture Kritios Boy (92), this sculpture shows the simplicity of the human anatomy and displays a nice neutral face. Furthermore, there are two characterizations that are crucial to identify when distinguishing the two styles. One of these characterization is called “contrapposto”, this is when the sculptures head is slightly turned and the right leg is bent forward at the knee to give the impression of the weight being held on the left leg (93) and the other is the change of using marble to create the sculptures to bronze materials. Both of these characterizations are evident in the sculpture Warrior from Riace (95), this lovely man is made of bronze and has his head slightly tilted and his weight shifted to one leg.
Hellenistic sculptures are quite different from Classical Greek sculptures in many ways. To begin Hellenistic sculptures went beyond just representing basic human anatomy, you can see movement and action being represented through them. This can be seen in the sculpture The Winged Nike (113), the wind causing the flow of her dress as she descends from heaven (112) shows a great amount of movement, triumph, and beauty whereas in classical sculptures they were quite stagnant. This can also be seen in the sculpture Laocoon and His Two Sons (115), the look of terror and anguish on their faces show the emotion typically represented in Hellenistic art, and the bulging muscles father is sporting while fighting off the snake shows action in Hellenistic sculptures. This style expresses everything that Classic Greek lacked. For example, Hellenistic style is full of expression, personality, and a range of emotions from happiness to pure terror while Classic Greek sculptures maintained a neutral look. Hellenistic sculptures depict an array of different people from infants to the elderly(112) while Classical Greek sculptures were usually young men with no defects (96). The representation of different age groups is shown in the sculpture of the Sleeping Eros (113) a small infant angel sleeping, you can see the fluidity and relaxed nature of the little angles form. Imperfections were also shown in Hellenistic sculptures, this is shown through the sculpture Boxer (114). The man in Boxer is riddled with scars and is sporting a broken nose (114), not something the Classic Greek sculptors would find very attractive.
<span class="btn btn-main-style"
Why Is Poverty Increasing Among Children?
“In 1991, more than one in five children under 18 years of age lived in poverty: and among children under 6 years of age, the poverty rate was 24% almost one of every four children in this age group was poor” (198pg. Lewit). Resulted from the termination of loyal employees at several, American unemployment rates raised.
The growing space between wages earnings and the cost of housing in the United States leaves millions of families and individuals unable to make ends meet. “Children’s economic wellbeing depends primarily on the income of their families. Accordingly, children are classified as being poor if they live in families whose annual money incomes included cash benefits from the government programs before taxes fall below official poverty threshold” (199pg. Lewit). Three factors that explain the cause of childhood poverty is demographic changes, an increase e in single parent households, and the economy.
Order now
The poverty rate in single parent household are greater than children living in both parent’s households. Poverty occurs mostly in Blacks and Hispanic, in 1991 the percentage of Black and Hispanic children below poverty thresholds was 42% black and 38% according to U.S Census Bureau. (201pg. Lewit). In recent years, the age of benefits to families in poverty has changed. Traditional welfare programs have been reduced but programs like income tax credit and Medicaid had expanded. By these programs it put some children above the poverty level”.
For example, when the definition of family income is expanded to include the value of noncash benefits received minus taxes paid, the poverty rate among children drops” (206pg. Lewit). In 1991 the cash transfer and noncash benefits had the effect of reducing the child poverty rate than in 1980, but now it appears that the reduction in public support for children in low income families increase poverty among children and decline the well-being of some children.