Benefits of Revolutionary Military Technologies
The U.S. military is responsible for the creation of many revolutionary technologies. This kind of tech being made and used is very positive for Americans’ safety. Risks of dangerous activities can be taken away by these new techs, so we can be safer and more successful. If you create a new technology to detect threats in a suburban area, many deaths could be prevented from acts of violence. Soldiers can be taken out of dangerous situations by being replaced by AI and such to carry out a mission.
Carrying out or defending against war is obviously not one of the easiest things to do. There are many things that could go wrong, psychologically or physically. With the implication of new technology, soldiers’ jobs will become much easier. Things have already been made like this to prevent possible human error. Radars have been made to detect lifeforms or specific materials. Recon drones have been made to scout areas, so soldiers may know what’s coming and have a better chance of survival. If the technology is made to do its job, there will be less room for human flaws.
Enhancing Safety and Minimizing Human Casualties
Another reason why the development of these kinds of technological precautions is so important is just considering the safety of the people. One way of looking at this is taking soldiers physically out of the situation altogether. Being in a battle situation will always have the risk of injury or death. There has been a development of these kinds of devices, such as fighter and stealth jets with strictly auto-pilot, and they have been trying to create automated soldiers. This kind of revolution can minimize the number of human casualties making war safer as a whole. And if there is only the risk of losing technology and not human life, more dangerous missions could be a crucial part of securing a victory.
Our writers can help you with any type of essay. For any subject
Order now
This kind of technology is very beneficial to us on the battleground, but what about in a different environment? In the past, they have adapted previous war tech into something for public use with the same basic idea. They have done it before with GPS, used by the military as means of locating troops and missiles launched for submarines. We wouldn’t have the internet if the military didn’t create it as a means of communication. It would be unknown to us to be able to check the weather if the radar wasn’t invented during World War 2 and adapted to read different things. A lot of things we use all the time in our lives would not be around without being made in the military.
Ethical Concerns and Potential Drawbacks
Although, there are certain thoughts on war tech that show its negative sides. There is, of course, the fact that someone could use new war tech for not its intended purpose. If there is a weapon capable of committing mass destruction, somebody could abuse it. If that could happen, one could argue if it’s even worth making. Then to add on top of that, if someone functional enough is made, it could eliminate jobs that soldiers and other military officials have. If there is no use for soldiers, then the soldiers won’t have jobs. Finally, there is the claim that there is no point in making new tech because, eventually, everyone will have it. There are ways that countries have been able to find out about a tech another country has and mimic it. If this continues, there will be no point in having new tech because it will never leave you with the upper hand. Fortunately, with enough work, all of this could be fixed. For the problem with abusing the technology, one could simply put precautions in case someone were to try something like this and security on the tech to make sure it’s not happening. The solution to the job problem is virtually the problem itself. While people are losing jobs to these AI, at the same time, people are gaining jobs to create them. If there is a worry about the publicity of the tech to rival militaries, there, of course, could be ways of diluting the issue with minimal staff on the project, a small base of work, and maybe even red herrings could help the issue.
Conclusion: Safeguarding Society Through Technological Innovation
In conclusion, war technology can, and is, being made beneficial to us and our society. They can make us safer in our everyday lives and in dangerous war situations. If it can be helped, these war technologies will make it so we can avoid being in these situations altogether. Best of all, they can be made for use outside of war. After people see what it is capable of, they will adapt it to make it even more useful to people outside the military. Without war technologies, it would be a difficult and dangerous world to live in, with no means of protection from other people who want to cause problems, no easy way to figure out what the weather will be, and no easy way to figure out how to get somewhere. We are much better off with war technologies.
References
- National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA). (2012). How Military Technology Benefits Civilian Life. National Defense Magazine.
- Congressional Research Service. (2022). Emerging Military Technologies: Background and Issues for Congress.
Causes Of The English Civil War: Unraveling The Causes
Colonial Grievances and Unfair Taxation
None of the persons living in the thirteen colonies had direct assemblies in the Parliament of Great Britain. He most strongly angered the colonists by taxation without submission. King George III appears as the strongest complaint written in the Declaration of Independence. This was the cause why they had no right to vote for who would represent them and how they would be taxed. The colonists required independence from Great Britain for a variety of reasons. More than that, they were constantly intimidated. This is, in general, a very weighty motive that they took to the hands of the England government to secede from Great Britain. Because of the deprivation of colonists of such rights, the British administration freely assessed taxes to the colonists when they wanted and the amount they wanted. The pressure was growing rapidly among Great Britain and the thirteen colonies because of the unfair laws that restricted borders and controlled them. Such as the existence of taxation without fair submission in the parliament, and their rights of them to collection were taken away by Britain.
This again aroused indignation among the colonists because of debts; the United Kingdom began again to demand everything from the colonists. In 1764, the United Kingdom began to strengthen control over the American colonies through acts. The army was hurried out of the city.
Our writers can help you with any type of essay. For any subject
Order now
Path to Independence and the Townshend Law
These unfair requests led to tension and anger and led the colonists to claim, as well as to, the war of independence. In 1767 The Townshend Law was announced. This law required that stamps be purchased or included in various subjects and documents, such as playing cards, legal documents, newspapers, and much more.
This was, in general, the first direct tax that Britain imposed on the colonists. At the same time, this tax was not abolished by President Jawaharlal Nehru. On the 4th of July in 1776, the first colony declared independence, and on the 19th of July, all 13 colonies declaration of independence. Events began to escalate with the passage of the Townshend Acts in 1767. The resolution of creating these taxes was to help colonial officials become independent of the colonists, giving them a source of income. When they began to establish their supremacy over the provinces in India, the tax on salt grew very much.
Struggles in India and Unfair Taxation
The salt tax blamed the Indian people for basic human needs and forbade them to make their salt. The better part of the colonists feared that their property would be taken away because of unbearable tax earnings and the lack of opportunity to fight taxation. England deployed an army of 300 thousand people.
To suppress the “rebellion” of the American colonies, could not collect an army of 55 thousand people; the best British commanders and naval commanders rejected the king’s proposals to fight with the Americans, the people looked at the campaign, so the king was waging as a fratricidal war. The complaints and protests against British pressure and control arose not only among the Americans but also among people living in British India. The main outbreak of complaints, protests, and condemnation was the cause of unfair taxation and pressure on the colonists.
India was another country subjected to British dominance. India was subject to pressure like colonists. However, after declaring independence from Great Britain in 1776, the war would last for five years. The UK adopted a currency law prohibiting colonies from issuing paper bills or bills due to the belief that the colonial currency devalued British money. This was because laws in England claimed that “someone may not be taxed if he or she does not have a voice in the government. This fact proves precisely that British rule is irrational and unfair. These taxes were strict for Indian citizens and were severely condemned by them. Despite public protests regarding the salt tax, it continued to be in force from 1835 to 1946. This continued until the war began.
Impact of Unfair British Control
During the pre-revolutionary years, the British government introduced several laws on taxation. Just why the colonists had to arrange and feed them. Nevertheless, the war between France and India was a struggle between Great Britain and France, which lasted from 1754-1763. Moreover, this led to the identification of evidence of unfair British control in all other countries. The significant legislative act, which violated the colonists, was the Press Act, adopted in 1765. Several people were killed. Many aspects of social life and religious beliefs were declared illegal by Britain only because the English considered them “disgusting.” In addition, the British also imposed unfair taxes on India. This law regulated colonial trade and tax collection from them. When the British soldiers opened fire on the crowd, showering them with ridicule. This gave rise to fear and anger that came from the free government that Britain had over the colonists. The UK administration abused their rights as Englishmen. In addition, to continue to support the British soldiers remaining in America after the war, Britain passed the Quartering Act in 1765.
Strained Relations and Colonial Response
It was the 24th of March when Britain passed the Law on Quartering Act. The reason for the quartering act of 1765 was to increase the incomes of the British colonies in America. The Sugar Law was adopted to increase the duty on foreign sugar imported from the West Indies. It was this act that led to fights between British troops and colonists, which caused the well-known Boston massacre. This became the source of disputes among some colonies and Great Britain in the years before the revolution. The British soldiers settled in the houses of the colonists.
References
- The Declaration of Independence. (1776). In Journals of the Continental Congress.
- Great Britain. The Stamp Act . New York, A. Lovell & company, 1895.
- Gerlach, Don R. “A Note on the Quartering Act of 1774.” The New England Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 1, 1966, pp. 80-88.
