Feminism In The Yellow Wallpaper And The Story Of An Hour

Throughout “The Yellow Wallpaper”, written by Charlotte Perkins Gillman, the protagonist is described as a woman of the 1800’s facing oppression by male dominance. In comparison, the protagonist from Kate Chopin’s, “The Story of an Hour”, experiences the same oppression. Both protagonists are dealing with some type of loss over the course of their short story, but in contrast the effectiveness of their loss differs on opposite ends of the spectrum. Ultimately both protagonists are portrayed as women who experience loss and oppression, but how the difference in loss affects each individual varies from joy to sadness.

During this period of time, women were granted few rights. Overall the female gender was expected to reproduce and take care of their husbands. As Kate Chopin writes, “But she saw beyond that bitter moment a long procession of years to come that would belong to her absolutely. And she opened and spread her arms out to them in welcome” (94), along with that, Gillman states, “He said I was his darling and his comfort and all he had, and that I must take care of myself for his sake” (85). The death of Chopin’s narrator’s husband passing away brought her freedom and self-discovery. Granted the will to no longer serve to her husband’s needs allows her to spend more time on herself. The pure joy felt by the narrator exemplifies how women were held accountable of taking care of everything else besides themselves. In comparison, Gillman’s narrator feels pressured to get better not for herself, but because her husband relies heavily on her nurturing.

Our writers can help you with any type of essay. For any subject

Order now

Along with these quotes, one of the more talked about right women were not granted in relevance to “The Yellow Wallpaper” included the ability to read and write. Jane, the narrator in this specific short story, mentions her writing in secret. For instance, “I did write for a while in spite of them; but it does exhaust me a good deal—having to be so sly about it, or else meet with heavy opposition” (80), along with “And I know John would think it absurd. But I must say what I feel and think in some way—it is such a relief!” (85). These statements provided give examples to the claim that women were not granted the right to think for themselves or express how they feel. Thus, another example of oppression.  All statements provided support the claim both women were facing oppression by the primary men in their lives.

Another comparison that can double as a contrast between these two women was their experience of loss. The narrator from “The Yellow Wallpaper” lost herself. Over the course of the story, Jane becomes so fixated on the wallpaper and her illness that she loses her sense of self-identity. One example from the text includes, ““I’ve got out at last”, said I, “in spite of you and Jane. And I’ve pulled off most of the paper, so you can’t put me back” (92). This statement was from Jane directly, referring to herself in third person as if she was a completely different entity. She continues to go on referring to herself that way at throughout the ending of the story. At this point, Jane has lost her sanity and believes to be the women she claimed seeing behind the wallpaper. On the other hand, the Chopin’s narrator experienced a physical loss; the loss of her husband. The author makes is known the husband has passed away early in the story. Even though her husband’s passing left her joyful, she did mention briefly she cared for him when the narrator said, “She knew that she would weep again when she saw the kind, tender hands folded in death” (94).  Although their losses were different, in a sense they have both lost something dear to them.

It is known that there are different ways to cope with losses and everyone grieves differently, but these two women could not have reacted anymore opposite. Gillman’s narrator reacted in complete sorrow and isolation. As Jane is gradually losing herself more over the course of the story, her body is deteriorating along with her mind. For example, written in the text, ““I don’t weigh a bit more,” said I, “nor as much; and my appetite may be better in the evening when you are here but it is worse in the morning when you are away” (86). As the text exemplifies Jane can not eat, nor gain weight. In fact, she is losing weight from this illness. Both symptoms are clear indicators that she is getting worse. On the other hand, Chopin’s protagonist was filled with great joy upon the news of her husband’s passing. Multiple times after her findings, the protagonist repeats the word free, feeling freedom from constantly serving a man. In the text Chopin writes, “But she saw beyond that bitter moment a long procession of years to come that would belong to her absolutely. And she opened and spread her arms out to them in welcome” (94). The feeling of no longer having to serve to her husband has allowed the women to begin imagining self-discovery and living for only herself; pure joy and happiness.

Ultimately it can be exemplified these short stories were written in comparison and contrast when analyzing the two.  As women during a period time before the Women’s Rights movement, life was difficult and unfair; portraying men as the dominant gender. Charlotte Perkins Gillman’s narrator was forced to hide her thoughts by writing in secret, along with struggling through sickness that was dismissed by her husband and not taken seriously. Kate Chopin’s protagonist was held captive by societal norms, having to serve her husband. Overall both of these women were suffering through oppression from the primary men in their lives and dealt with loss, but the way they handled their loss differed drastically.

Feminism In The Handmaid’s Tale

According to the Oxford Dictionary, feminism is the advocacy of women’s rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes (Oxford Dictionary). Despite many gender equality laws being passed and feminist movements being initiated in the late twentieth century, women were still struggling to achieve their rights. In the 1980s, a “third wave” of feminism began (Burkett & Brunell), which focused on intersectionality—the idea that women experienced layers of oppression caused by gender inequality (Zack). In interviews given around the time of the publication of the novel, coincidentally falling within the peak of the “third wave,” Margaret Atwood claims that in The Handmaid’s Tale, the tyrannical social practices she delineates hold historical precedents (Armstrong).

Therefore, this novel warns society of retrograde practices gaining fame again. Atwood sets her novel in a near-future New England where a theonomist totalitarian state—a society ruled by divine law under a Christian form of government—overthrows the United States government. The name of this new form of government is The Republic of Gilead, sometimes also referred to as merely Gilead. Written from the perspective of a handmaid—a woman assigned to bear children for elite couples that have trouble conceiving—named Offred, the novel exemplifies the despotic journey of Offred in the new form of government. In The Handmaid’s Tale, Margaret Atwood explores cautionary outlooks that mirror the gender inequality present in modern society by displaying the existence of body shaming, the diminishing value of women in society, the deficiency of personal identity, and the repression of females by other women.

Our writers can help you with any type of essay. For any subject

Order now

The Criticism of Body Image

In The Handmaid’s Tale, Atwood portrays women as the culprits of their gender inferiority. For example, when considering her body image, Offred feels ashamed. She claims that her “nakedness is strange to [her] already” (Atwood 72). Additionally, she questions herself whether she “really w[ore] bathing suits, at the beach […] among men, without caring that [her] legs, [her] arms, [her] thighs and back were on display” (Atwood 72). Thereafter, Offred goes on to insult herself by calling herself “shameful” and “immodest” and stating that she “do[es]n’t want to look at something that determines [her] so completely” (Atwood 72). Offred’s low morale regarding herself serves as evidence of her brainwashing that had occurred at the Red Center—a center in which handmaids were housed and trained. In addition, her reflection presents a criticism towards feminism by exemplifying the idea that women possess little to no confidence in their own body. Through Offred’s thoughts on modesty, she explains how women define themselves by the opinions of men. Offred feels shame in wearing a bathing suit among men, and she blames herself for even thinking about wearing such revealing clothes, thus validating that women center their lives around the judgements of men. Furthermore, Atwood displays the discontent nature of women regarding their bodies when Offred once again defames herself:

I can stroke myself, under the dry white sheets, in the dark, but I too am dry and white, hard, granular; it’s like running my hand over a plateful of dried rice; it’s like snow. […] I am like a room where things once happened and now nothing does, except the pollen of the weeds that grow up outside the window, blowing in as dust across the floor. (Atwood 118)

Alienated from her body, Offred feels dispassionate about herself. By comparing herself to an empty room, she depicts the meaninglessness of her body. In a more broad spectrum, one can interpret Offred’s self analysis as an expression of her desire to possess an official paid job. Due to being a handmaid in the newly created Republic of Gilead, Offred can no longer work. Technically, she has a job—that of being a handmaid. However, it is a job given to her against her will and she is not even paid salary for it. Moreover, her job merely consists of birthing children, thus making her feel as if her body is unserviceable to the world. Once more, her low self esteem and feeling of uselessness showcase personal body shaming. Similar to Offred’s negative body image of herself, many women today feel ashamed of their bodies. Specifically, by becoming victims of brainwashing by media’s expectations of the perfect woman, women harshly judge their bodies.

In a study conducted regarding measurements of Playboy centerfold models and Miss America contestants, David Garner, Ph.D., “documented that these ‘model women’ had become significantly thinner from 1959 to 1979 and that advertising for weight-loss diets had grown correspondingly;” a follow-up study revealed that the trend continues through the late 1980s (Garner). Garner’s study displays how media persuades women to strive for a thin body—the ideal body type. An additional study performed by psychotherapist Ann Keamey Cooke, Ph.D., in companionship with Garner revealed that “fifty-six percent of women [globally] say they are dissatisfied with their overall appearance” (Garner). The study’s results depict that more than half of the population of women are not content with their body, thus showing the extent to which media has trained the brains of women to body shame themselves. Offred’s personal reflection on her body and the studies regarding the twentieth century confirm that women are preyed upon by society to feel embarrassed about their bodies. Therefore, Atwood is mirroring the lives of women in the real world through her novel.  

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

× How can I help you?