What are some stylistic innovations of the work of Ernest Hemingway, and why do they use them? Ernest Hemingway is probably known as being one of the most influential American writers from the 20th century. He’s written famous works such as the novel The Old Man and the Sea and the short story “Hills Like White Elephants”. He is known as one of the most influential American writers from the 20th century and there is a reason why, he created a style of writing that can be seen in several works of authors that have admitted in Hemingway being an influence for their works. During his writing career, he eventually developed a writing style that became easily recognizable to others. Not only that, but he also invented a new method of telling a story, labeling it as the Iceberg Theory.
Ernest Hemingway was born towards the end of the 19th century in the year 1899. He was born in the state of Illinois in the town of Oak Park. He is most well known for being a writer, however he has done written for other publications instead of just making his own work. His career started when he was 17 years old, when he became a writer in a newspaper office in Kansas City. He then went on to become a reporter, travelling to places like Europe to cover events like the Greek Revolution. He has written several works throughout his life, and one that most people are most likely aware of, would be his novel, The Old Man and the Sea (Ernest Hemingway Biographical).
Our writers can help you with any type of essay. For any subject
Order now
As said beforehand, Hemingway’s writing style is easily recognizable. In his work, he uses simple sentences more often than any other sentence style. Looking at his novel The Old Man and the Sea, you can see that Hemingway uses simple sentences a lot throughout it. While Hemingway is known for using simple sentences and just getting the point across, he does so in The Old Man and the Sea. The general synopsis of the film is that a man catches a giant fish after struggling for a long amount of time to do so, and once he does, he realizes it is far too big for his boat and attaches it to the side of the boat, vulnerable to attacks from sharks. Eventually all the sharks eat the meat of the fish and leave a skeleton. There are several main points that are made throughout the book and the main one that has to do with the main part of the novel is just as easy to do so. Hemingway uses simple sentences in order to make a statement on how when people become too focused on an ideal or a goal, the eventually get tunnel vision and begin to lose themselves, only to be left with the remains. While the simple sentences he uses are in an abundance, the use of the narrative along with the simple sentences help establish the style Hemingway has created.
Ernest Hemingway wrote a multitude of short stories, and in fact, began his writing career in doing so, after being a journalist for several years. His first important collection of stories was published in Paris, France in the year of 1924. While this was not his first short story collection, he published Three Stories and Ten Poems in the year 1923, it is essential to clarify this collection of short stories as this helped kickstart a multitude of projects being published.
When discussing the stylistic innovations of Ernest Hemingway, it is important to look at his Iceberg theory, otherwise known as his theory of omission, that he coined. The definition of the theory of omission “is a theory that suggests that we cannot see or detect most of a situation’s data” (Nordqvist). Basically, Hemingway believed that by only giving the read one part of a situation, while another situation is actually happening just below the surface.
Fulker Of Chartres About Crusades
“In response to the defeat of the Byzantines, in section 3 of “Fulker of Chartres,” it says that the Pope had addressed Christendom saying that they need to come together to defend against the oncoming invasions of Muslim armies. This proves that the Crusades were a retaliation of lost land and Christian lives to the Muslim armies. Urban describes the horrors that the Muslims have already unleashed on Christians, and how they have laid waste to their kingdoms. Pope Urban II had commissioned the knights of Christendom to push back against the Serjuks and the Turks, and that reclaiming their previously owned land was the Lord’s will. Over the 11th and 13th centuries popes had called more Crusades to the Holy Land and also called for some in Spain and Portugal to help push back the Muslim powers. Crusades against Muslims were not called with the intention of converting Muslims to Christianity, rather to regain control of territory that was previously Christian and had fallen to Muslim armies. Jerusalem had been taken by the Muslims in 637 was considered particularly important to Western Christians as it was the site of Christ’s crucifixion, the foundation of the Christian faith. Indeed Jerusalem was considered the holiest site in the Christian nations and it was the consensus of European Christians that it be brought back under Christian rule, thus the First Crusade began.
The Crusaders were knights and footmen who were not on a quest for wealth or any sort of gain, they were there on a mission to fulfill the will of the Lord. What made a Crusade distinct was that the men who were involved in the fight had gained spiritual merits, usually being a plenary indulgence granted by the Pope. When in the 11th century news had arrived that Christian pilgrims travelling to Jerusalem were being harassed and murdered by the Seljuk Turks, this fact alone inspired many knights to join the First Crusade. Although the Crusades were called to regain lands, greed was NOT a primary motivation. Professor Jonathan Reiley Smith, the world’s foremost expert on the Crusades, has proven that crusading was a dangerous act and expensive. None of the knights who fought could have possibly gained wealth from these fights. Indeed, they often bankrupted themselves and their fiefs for the act of crusading. In section 28 of “Fulker of Chartres,” it says that even when the Crusaders could have taken wealth, they always replaced whatever they took with something of equal value. There was no gain to be had. This proves as an example that the Christians’ motive was not to gain wealth. The primary motivation for crusading was spiritual with the knights joining because they believed that they were doing God’s work by fighting to protect Christian pilgrims and to reclaim their land, and that the Crusade would win a spiritual merit. A Crusade was considered by the Western European Christians to be a holy act, an act of sacrifice and piety for the love of Christ. The Crusades were a military campaign waged by Western European Christians in the Middle Ages for the defense and expansion of Christendom.
Our writers can help you with any type of essay. For any subject
<span class="btn btn-main-style"
