Money Making College Athletes

10,800,000,000. Ten point eight billion dollars. I had to write it both ways because I had trouble reading that number out loud, and you probably will too. Think about the amount of zeros in that number. With that amount of money you can buy buy 74 Bugatti hyper-cars, stay 5,731 nights in the United States America’s most expensive hotel room, or if you like to party lavishly you can buy 390 bottles of million-dollar whisky. That number is what The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) makes per year. College athletics is a billion dollar industry and has been for a long time. Due to the increasing ratings of college athletics, this figure will continue to rise. There is a huge controversy on whether College athletes should receive a salary considering how much money these players make for their schools and the NCAA as a whole. The NCAA has 24 sports for student athletes to compete in, and a total number of over 460,000 student athletes participating in sports per year. Twenty four sports yet there’s only two sports that are considered for student salary, College Basketball and College Football. Those two sports generate 9.15 billion dollars out of the NCAA’s 10.8 Billion dollars. Thats 84% of the NCAA’s annual salary. Now what about the other 1.65 billion dollars the other 22 sports generate? The only two sports that people have these debates over is football and basketball, but theres more sports! If one student athlete is to receive a salary for playing their sport, then all 460,000 student athletes should receive a salary to be fair. This simply is impossible. How can you determine who gets paid what? Should the schools be offering the salary? Should Division 2 and Division 3 athletes get paid? Should a starting quarterback make more money than a bench warming kicker? College Athlete’s should not receive pay from their schools, or the NCAA, because there’s too many different variables, and no fair way to distinguish a set salary amongst all college athletes.

In a way, college athletes are already getting paid to play their sports. Its called a scholarship. Scholarships come with many benefits. “About two percent of high school athletes are awarded athletic scholarships to compete in college” (Bertolas 1). It is a privilege to get the opportunity to play at the collegiate level, let alone be awarded an athletic scholarship. This opportunity should not be taken for granted. To play at the collegiate level is something all athletes dream of and for most, it is the highest level of competition. Student-athletes being paid would only create more of a problem for other athletes, students, and universities. So what are these Student-athletes actually getting from their scholarships? They receive more than just free classes. The scholarship includes tuition, books, food, housing, and branded clothing (athletic wear). Scholarships on average are over $100,000 worth of money a year (Bertolas 1). On top of a scholarship, student athletes are given other benefits such as free tutors, scheduling benefits, trainers, strength and conditioning coaches, free facilities, more clothes, and equipment. At some universities all the extra benefits that athletes receive can total $200,000 over all four years (Bertolas 1). If the athletic scholarship and all the benefits were to be added together, student athletes are making over $150,000 a year. When athletes sign their National Letter of Intent, they are signing a contract that says that they are going to play for a university or a school in exchange for a scholarship. Before signing, student-athletes are aware that they cannot receive extra benefits from other organizations. Athletes are committing to represent the university, not their individual name. While representing the university, they also will represent the companies that sponsor the universities and the team. Universities can be sponsored by types of brand names like: Adidas, Nike, and Under Armour. Although the companies are sponsoring the university, they are also sponsoring the individual athlete as well.

Our writers can help you with any type of essay. For any subject

Order now

One of the major issues that comes with paying college athletes is determining how you distribute the money. If football and basketball are every schools main source of revenue, should they only get paid? What about the athletes who participate in the other 22 sports schools offer. Should they receive money too? Should they receive as much as a football or basketball player? Should every single athlete on a winning team receive the same amount of money? What if you’re a starting point guard and you average 20 points vs a backup point guard who only averages 2 points a game. Should the pay be the same? What if you have 2 star players, or maybe even 3. How can you decide who gets paid more? Maybe they should be paid equally, but if they all receive equal pay what about the other contributing players on the team? I think you get the idea. There’s way too many variables that make it basically impossible to decide how student-athletes should get paid. The most important question is who will pay these athletes? The Universities, or the NCAA. The max a college can “pay” an athlete (through scholarships) is the max cost of attending/living at the school. (Grimett 3). There’s already a cap on how much money Colleges can give their players, so would top tier student athletes even get paid as much as they should be? No. Some people believe that if the NCAA brings in millions of dollars, the least they can do is give back large amounts to the players who are making them their money. It is true that the NCAA racks in a lot of money but they actually redistribute a large amount of the money they make. The NCAA spend money on Sport Sponsorship and Scholarship Funds, Division I Basketball Performance Fund, Division I Championships, Student-Athlete Services, and educational programs. (Grenardo 2). There’s no way both the NCAA and the universities can actually afford to pay athletes.

Do athletes only care about the money and making it as a pro? Or do they think about what a privilege it is to play for a college team, and receive a FREE EDUCATION. Most college athletes have dreams and aspirations of going pro in their sports, and thats okay. The numbers of NCAA college athletes going pro are extremely low. Out of 5 major pro sports (Football, Women’s and Men’s Basketball, Baseball, Ice Hockey) fewer than 2 percent of college athletes go pro. (Grenardo 2). If we were to pay student athletes while they’re in college, we would just be giving them a bunch of money to have for their lives. They would have no incentive to go and find jobs because they already were getting paid money without even being a professional. It would put student athletes at a huge advantage, when the average college student graduates with large amounts of student debt. Normal college students have to spend so much money on tuition and other fees for them to attend college. Imagine being a student and a portion of the money you give to your school goes back to college athletes. How unfair is that? That’s something that actually happens. Studies show that in larger universities such $800 of a students tuition cost goes back to funding for student-athletes. (Bertolas 1). If you were a star athlete in high school and you worked hard, you deserve that full scholarship, and nothing more.

If athletes get paid how will it affect themselves and the game of sports in general. Some people say that they see their scholarships as being paid because they basically pay for a good part of their expenses that they don’t need to spend their own money. As a direct result to athletes being paid it will cause more students to pay more attention to the money than staying in school and concentrating on grades and actually playing in the games. Also NCAA president says “if college athletes start being paid many schools would end up leaving division 1 sports. Is it a schools choice to not pay their athletes or do they just not have the money to afford to spend a few grand a year on each top performing athletes. The NCAA requests that 25 sports teams across the United States and have argued that athletes shouldn’t be paid and that they are students and not employees. Some authors argue that payment caps set by the NCAA that are holding back athletes being paid. Another factor that has been affecting the NCAA is that $1 billion from tuitions were given to the NCAA department of athletics that couldn’t been spent on paying athletes. Lastly a case between Ed O’bannon and the NCAA says that athletes could theoretically be paid five thousand a year but they have denied too and O’bannon lost the case which allowed the NCAA to keep their money and not pay athletes.

College athletes should not be paid because it ruins the way that college players pick which colleges to go to. According to Ekow N. Yankah in “Why N.C.A.A. Athletes Shouldn’t Be Paid,” “Paying student athletes erodes that association. A high-school football prodigy reported that he chose Michigan not for its academic quality, tradition, or beautiful campus but because it outbid all other suitors, a connection to the university’s values would be lost.” If we start to pay athletes, being good or having a good school won’t matter. Most athletes pick a certain college to make them get noticed by a NFL team. When being paid, athletes would chose the college who has the most money to offer them. Colleges sell merchandise at different events. For example at football games they sell jerseys with different numbers on them. When college football players say they don’t get paid for them selling their jerseys, they are wrong because they don’t put their name on the back of the jersey like they do in the NFL. They now have no argument about the school using their name when they don’t. Some athletes say they play for the school and should get paid. This argument is invalid because you chose to go to that college and play a sport for the school. You will make money if you are good enough to go pro. According to Kieran McCauley in ” College athletes shouldn’t be paid,” “College athletes don’t need to worry about student loans because of their school being paid for.” It wouldn’t be fair for other students if only the athletes got paid.

Date Rape

Date rape is a type of acquaintance rape in which there is a potential sentimental or sexual connection between the two partners at the time the sexual assault occurs. The assailant utilizes either physical or mental intimidation forcing the victim to engage in sexual relations without their consent, or when they are uncapable of consenting in light of the fact that they are either under the influence of alcohol or drugs. That being said, in this short scenario I perceive that Peter is to blame here in light of the fact that from the minute he met Sue he began to slut-shame her based on her attire and actions. His assumptions were very biased from the moment he laid eyes on her.

Furthermore, Peter states on his side of the story that after they kissed, they both laid in his bed. He began to assume that they would have sexual intercourse, that is why he started to undress her. Even though, Sue put a little resistance he still continued with his actions and ended up making her cry. Sue’s tears should have made him stop and realize that she didn’t want to continue and that he was the one forcing her to do so. Based on Peter’s intentions, I would have to say that he would have indulged in a sexual coercion whether the girl was conscience or not. There was no communication, if there was it would have changed the scenario and nothing bad would have happened if they both were to be honest on what their intentions were.

Our writers can help you with any type of essay. For any subject

Order now

Both Peter and Sue used different types of rape myths, but the one that caught my attention the most was, “we drank together, she came to my room, and dressed and acted like she wasn’t a virgin.” Most men, like peter, think that woman’s’ appearance and actions are an invitation for them to have sex with us. For example, if I were to go for a jog around my neighborhood those that mean that I invite or deserve to be rape? The answer is No. Woman wearing revealing clothing, behaving provocatively, or drinking a lot does not mean that we are asking for it.

The rape culture elements that are present in this scenario is slut-shaming, which indicated that the word “slut” refers to a person who dress “promiscuously,” which Peter was certainly doing when he laid eyes on Sue. If I was in this situation there would be a couple of things I would off done differently. For instance, I would have just kept dancing and having fun with him until it was time to leave. Having said that, I wouldn’t have agreed going to his dorm, I would have just exchanged numbers and maybe meet up at a coffee shop before or after class, so we could keep getting to know each other a bit more, well that is if we were interested in me other than just to be sexually active with me. I would have also called it a night and go to my dorm with my friends. These are different types of way that I would have handled the situation, because by doing so it would help me prevent something that could change my life.

Rape is a sexual assault that involves sexual intercourse or other forms of sexual penetration carried out against a person without that person’s consent. According to FindLaw, “Florida state laws currently include rape under the offense of ‘sexual battery.’ The relevant statutes no longer give a separate legal definition of rape. To prove a rape offense, a prosecutor must establish each of the elements for sexual battery given by state law.” The age of consent is eighteen years old. It is the minimum age at which an individual is considered legally old enough to consent to participation in sexual activity. Individuals aged seventeen or younger in Florida are not legally able to consent to sexual activity, and such activity may result in prosecution for statutory rape. Florida statutory rape law is violated when a person has consensual sexual intercourse with an individual under age eighteen. Close in age exemptions exist, allowing minors aged sixteen or seventeen to engage in sexual intercourse with a partner no older than age twenty-three as reported by The Florida Age of Consent Laws 2018.

Furthermore, FindLaw also states that the punishment for rape comes from the Florida crime laws regarding sexual battery. The potential punishment depends on the age of the victim and the defendant; use of any weapons; injuries suffered by the victim; if the victim is under the age of twelve and the defendant is over the age of eighteen (capital felony, punishable by death or life imprisonment with no parole); if defendant was under eighteen years old (life felony, punishable by imprisonment for at least thirty years or life). Also, the minimum charge for sexual battery committed on a victim over the age of twelve (second degree felony, punishable by imprisonment up to fifteen years); these circumstances include the defendant’s threats or coercive acts, victim’s physical incapacity, or the victim’s physical inability to resist the sexual battery. Now, if the defendant used a deadly weapon or physical force likely to cause a serious bodily injury to victim over the age of twelve during a sexual battery, the offense becomes punishable as a life felony.

Subsequently, victims of sexual assault have a lot of tools for instance, the article “Sexual Battery” states that a victim can report the crime to law enforcement and ask the state attorney to file a criminal complaint against the offender(s). Prior to submitting a final report, the law enforcement officer should allow you to review the report and provide a statement as to its accuracy. As a victim, you have the constitutional right to be informed, to be present, and to be heard at all crucial stages of a criminal or juvenile proceeding, to the extent that this right does not interfere with the constitutional rights of the accused. When a sexual crime has occurred, law enforcement should provide or arrange for transportation to the appropriate medical facility, so you could be examined by a registered nurse or doctor. Once there, in a private area, the medical professional will conduct a head-to-toe exam checking for injuries and collecting evidence which may include a pelvic exam and taking photos. As a victim, you have the right to: say no to any part of the exam at any point; keep the exam confidential; have an advocate from a certified rape crisis center with you. A medical professional may also prescribe medications to protect you from certain sexually transmitted infections and recommend follow-up medical care.

Finally, from this short scenario I can say there is never justification for sexually assaulting someone. It’s all about making the right choices and having communication. Just remember, consent means intelligent, knowing, and voluntary consent that does not include coerced submission.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

× How can I help you?