Probation and parole are both a part of correctional treatment in the criminal justice system. Probation is decided upon during the sentencing phase of the court system, and it replaces incarceration by requiring that the offender follows certain rules while under the supervision of a probation officer for a predetermined length of time. This allows the person that is convicted of a crime to remain in the community while being rehabilitated, as long as the provisions summarized by the judge are followed. Probation requires continual visits to probation officers, as well as other conditions that may include payment of fines, completing community service, and submitting to random drug tests. Probation is often offered to first time offenders who commit non-violent crimes and consists of several different types to suit each set of circumstances. Probation may be supervised or unsupervised, and can also require that the offender’s location be monitored by a GPS tracking device.
The offender may possibly have restrictions on leaving their home residence, except when given permission by the probation officer.Parole has many similarities to probation. It also has a main goal of reintegrating offenders into society. Instead of being issued at trial as a sentence, it is a supervised release of an individual that has already served a length of prison or jail time. It is permitted by the parole board after a minimum jail sentence has been served under the condition of compliance and good behavior. Violations of the terms can result in the individual serving the original sentence that was replaced, which is also true for probation. These violations can include failure to pay restitution or fines, associating with other offenders, or being arrested for any reason. The officer decides whether to issue a warning to the violator, or require that the offender appear in court for a hearing on the violation. The severity of the offense is taken into consideration when the course of action is determined. In a violation hearing, the recommendation of the officer typically weighs heavily on the judge’s decision of handling the situation.Offenders usually agree on signing away certain civil liberties when agreeing to probation or parole requirements as part of their status of avoiding incarceration.
<span class="btn btn-main-style"
Enron: The Chandel Of The A Lifetime
Enron was a perfect storm of under regulation and corrupt consumerism. In many ways Enron was only the beginning in the way american business are to be proceeded today. In addition this case study will be focused on the business model, the specific action that caused its downfall, the consequences of this major event and lastly what all this means in today’s world. With that being stated Enron was at the time seen to be the very best and a shooting star that can go far. The company was seen to be geared towards success in many ways. It was an meritocratic venture that throw out the lowest twenty percent of the employees and heavily gifted the best and hardest working employees. In addition Enron did not stop thier because Enron was over ambitions. They came up with may of gray area business tactics that in many of the companies today use to get a leg over their competitors. Enron in some cases an example of just how bad things can get when men’s ambitions are bigger than their capabilities. With the introduction settled the next section will focus on Enron’s business model.
Enron began as a humble interstate pipeline company in the hart of american business Texus. The foundation was struck when the company’s Houston Natural Gas and Omaha-based InterNorth merged in 1985. The company at the time was going throw a same phase as in the soviet union. The market sector was deregulated and a new and more lucrative business model had to be generated or else the company would go bust. The company hired Jeffrey Skilling as a consultant and the end result the concept of brokering energy or buying the natural gas from a supplier and then selling that gas to a private entity was born. After this was settled the next step for Enron was to establish its own financial branch of the company and then to attract the best and brightest. In 1990 This new business culture was being formed and its the outcome was astounding. The program was to rate all the employees on a number biases and to show the door the ones that did not fit the mold. The next major step for the company was to get into the electric business and start applying the lessons from providing gas to now start providing electricity. So in 1997 Enron bought out an electric utility company that was named Portland General Electric Corp. At this point Enron eclipsed itself in more ways than one. It’s focus at this point was to grow rapidly and to expand in to any trading community that it can. In addition one major change happened around this point of time mark to market. The concept of marked to market was very subjective and that they would buy something and then post what they thought the price should be of such a deal. This was truly the first mistake in which Enron the company made. Then around the start of the new century in the 2000’s Enron started to feel the burn of competition and it started becoming less profitable. In the next section the passage will continue with the specific actions that caused an end to Enron.
<span class="btn btn-main-style"