Racial Profiling: A Persistent Issue In Contemporary Society

“Is racial profiling still an issue today? Racial profiling is not a product of modern times, Racial profiling has existed since the formation of America. Individuals of the Anglo Saxon community have always been a part of a dominant race which has led to problems with minority groups. Racial profiling is a problem in society and will continue to be an issue with our justice system because people fall victims to discrimination based on the color of their skin and other personal characteristics.

According to Schmalleger, racial profiling is defined as, “any police action initiated in the basis of the race, ethnicity, or natural origin of a suspect rather than on the behavior of that individual, or on information that identifies the individual as being, or having been, engaged in criminal activity” (Schmalleger, 2018, pg. 196). In other words, authorities must not base their judgements off of the appearance of any individual.

Our writers can help you with any type of essay. For any subject

Order now

Law enforcement officers must protect the people, not harass or discriminate them because of their identity. However, it is often that authorities take advantage of their positions and continue to take part in such profiling. Racial profiling is illegal, and occurs often. Black people live fearing being hurt or discriminated by the police. In the “Vox” website, Lockhart tells stories that have to do with African American people being racially profiled by authorities for being black, or light skinned.

Racial profiling stories are published frequently in the media, and have obtained the phrase “Living While Black.” According to Lockhart, “it is a phrase that encompasses the myriad ways black people are seen as suspicious, profiled, and threatened with responses from police for minor infractions, or less” (Lockhart, 2018). Lockhart tells the story of how two African American men were arrested at a Starbucks coffee shop for simply being black.

The two men entered the establishment for a business meeting, and while waiting, they soon found themselves surrounded by police officers. The two men did not commit a crime, but instead fell victims to racial profiling by white spectators within the coffee shop. The store manager who was described as a white man called the police on them with the excuse that they did not purchase anything, nor wanted to leave the coffee shop. The two men were charged for disturbing the peace and trespassing without actually committing such crime.

Schmalleger states, “racial profiling is unacceptable because it weakens the public’s confidence in the police, thereby decreasing police-citizen trust and cooperation. Numerous states have enacted legislation banning the use of racial profiling by justice agencies,” (Schmalleger, 2018, pg.198). In Lockhart’s story one of the men stated to the media, “When I saw the police officers, I feared for my life,” (Lockhart, 2018).

This statement resonates the fact that black folks are afraid of law enforcement officers and fear authorities’ presence. Black Lives Matter is a civil rights movement that originated from African American communities to campaign against violence and racism against black people. According to the BLM movement, “young black men are 21 times more likely than white counterparts to be shot by police” (A Civil Rights Movement for the 21st Century). This movement was organized after the not-guilty verdict in the injustice killing of Trayvon Martin, a young black man in the hands of an American man. Trayvon was racially profiled by his killer for appearing to be a suspicious and black man.

Racial profiling is an issue today. Although illegal, many individuals face this dilemma with our justice system. The ones that are most affected by it are the African American people and many people of color. In order for racial profiling to not exist, we must have a colorblind justice system.”

Importance Of Sex Education In America


Hello Judge. My name is Preston Peterson, and I am the first speaker for the affirmative side of the following resolution: The United States Board of Education should adopt total comprehensive sex education. Sex education is primarily defined as “any process dedicated to providing information about sexual techniques, practices, and health or human sexuality” (“Sex Education,” 2015 ). Majority of schools face issues involving the practice of informing youth about medically accurate information regarding their bodies without exceeding parental boundaries.

The idea of teaching sex education should be about giving Americans the knowledge of how to use the information provided to protect their health; allowing them to make decisions that could be beneficial for future circumstances that may possibly occur. Our opponents are against the teaching of comprehensive sex education so they will be arguing the fact that abstinence teaching is the most effective way to teach sex education. Proposition 1. Comprehensive sex education should prevent teen pregnancy; Proposition 2. Comprehensive sex education should prevent the transmission of STDs.

Our writers can help you with any type of essay. For any subject

Order now

Through the implementation of comprehensive sex education it has been shown that it reduces teen pregnancy. The states that continue to push the abstinence method discovered that they have higher birth rates than those who take the more comprehensive approach. For example, “Alabama places a heavy emphasis on abstinence and in 2017 there where 27 births per every 1000 teen girls compared to a state that favored a more comprehensive standpoint. New York only has 12.5 births per every 1000 teen girls compared to abstinence only teaching methods” (Kathrin F. Stranger-Hall & David W. Hall, 2011).

Comprehensive sex education should prevent the transmission of STDs. This form of education teaches that “abstinence is the best method for avoiding STDs and unintended pregnancy, but also teaches about condoms and contraception to reduce the risk of unintended pregnancy and of infection with STDs, including HIV” (Alford, 2009).

This education should prevent the lack of knowledge that comes when abstinence-only sex education does not prepare teens for safe sex to those that decide against waiting until marriage. “The use of male contraception has a 82% of a success rate of preventing pregnancy” (NHS, 2017). Practicing abstinence only works for a select few, so teaching the youth about contraception will help them prevent teen pregnancy and heavily reduce the amount of STDs transmitted in the community.


In promoting and teaching comprehensive sex education, educators focus on the student’s entire wellbeing, rather than simply arguing against any sexual experiences entirely.

There are other comprehensive sex education programs, named “abstinence-plus,” which promote abstinence in an inclusive and explicit environment; one that promotes abstinent behaviors but does not exclude important teachings on sexual and relationship matters.47

Supporters of comprehensive sex education programs in public schools claim that their positive impact includes outcomes such as helping individuals choose and prepare for adult roles; strengthening family life, both at the present and in the future; encouraging responsible behavior; and increasing acceptance of and tolerance for diverse lifestyles. One of the primary functions of comprehensive sex education programs is to give students effective advice to use in situations that might occur in social settings among their peers and later in their lives as well. Thank you for your time, judge, and please vote affirmative.”

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

× How can I help you?