Struggle For Same Sex Marriage Equality

Marriage is a responsibility between two people. That is a practically widespread idea. What that responsibility involves in any case, is differed from culture to culture. In recent America, marriage is a commitment of faithfulness and love. It is an official contract binding two individuals together furnishing them with the advantages of marriage, for example, emergency medical rights and tax reductions. But gays and lesbians are reliably denied rights that are ordinarily underestimated by the normal American. In particular, gay and lesbians couples are denied the privilege to wedding regardless of whether they are an upstanding resident of the United States. The inquiry affecting America today is whether the rights to these advantages and duties ought to be stretched out to individuals of a similar sex. The appropriate response is just, why not? Legitimizing same sex marriage is the correct decision for America since it is economically, politically, socially, and morally the choice that will improve the United States.

Same sex marriage is being acknowledged and authorized in an ever increasing number of nations around the globe like Germany and Norway. Legalizing same sex marriage would improve the impression of America across the big nations of the world. America is known by the rest of the world as a position of extremism and prejudice. Martin Luther King gave his “I Have a Dream” speech one hundred thirty-one years after England liberated slaves. Since the Civil Rights Movement, African Americans are as yet underprivileged in some areas of the United States. These things indirectly affects America’s reputation around the world. On the other hand if the United States authorized same sex marriage, it would be an inspiration to the countries of the world that America is prepared to go along with them in a modern and equivalent society. This thought of equivalent society applies universally, however locally also. The United States does not lawfully perceive the privileges of gay and lesbian couples. Authorizing same sex marriage would satisfy the assurances of the U.S. Constitution that all men and women are made equivalent and reserve the privileges to life, freedom, and the pursuit of happiness. It would enable same sex couples to demonstrate their constructive outcome on society and make an increasingly peaceful and tolerant society.

Our writers can help you with any type of essay. For any subject

Order now

In this modern world, there are hundreds of state and national organizations that support the legalization of same sex marriage. The one I am inspired by and share common values and beliefs is the GLBTQ Legal Advocates and Defenders. This is a non profit legal rights organization who supports same sex marriage and has an aim to eradicate discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. Civil rights have never been anything but difficult to win. Battling for them takes enthusiasm, expertise and a flat out assurance to win. That is the thing that GLAD conveys each and every day. GlAD’s intense and powerful promotion has accomplished scores of points of reference setting legitimate triumphs to end separation dependent on sexual orientation and HIV status profiting people, couples and families across New England and the United States. Each time GLAD contends a case or handles an issue, they tear down a greater amount of the obsolete laws and generalizations that have denied LGBTQ individuals and individuals living with HIV essential securities and openings in all areas of everyday life – family, school, business, housing, government, human services, and beyond. Regardless of whether it’s marriage for same-sex couples, non-segregation arrangements for transgender individuals in the work environment, or insurances for individuals living with HIV, GLAD doesn’t shrivel from extreme issues. The most important thing I like about this organization is how they support and come forward regarding any issues of the same sex and they provide all legal help to them. Another good thing about them is that they organize rallies for the support of sexual orientation and this is very beneficial as it can improve the mentality of some different caste people who don’t believe in same sex marriage.

If same sex couples are given the privilege to wedding, they ought to have the right to adopt kids together and raise families. Some people fight that bringing children up in a marriage with a mother and mother or father and father separates family esteems. It has likewise been recommended that bringing a kid up in an equivalent sex marriage makes that kid gay. Neither of these contentions is legitimate. Numerous gay couples have officially received and brought up kids, and these youngsters have turned out as fit as a fiddle, ordinary, heterosexual kids. Having youngsters being removed from child care and being raised by a couple of adoring, steady guardians would never be inconvenient for our society. The most imperative piece of bringing up kids to wind up cheerful and beneficial individuals from society is to give a cherishing environment where they feel safe. Having two adoring guardians for a child is more important than judging the sexual orientation of those guardians.

There may be many people and organizations who may have different and concerning views on the legalization of same sex marriage. It isn’t morally right to advise two individuals who are willing to spend their lives together that they can’t be married. Numerous individuals would differ with these statements. People who are against same sex marriage would likewise source the Bible, which says marriage is between a man and a lady. They argue that gay individuals can’t be married on the grounds that God would not permit it. The Bible additionally says that the holy union of marriage ought not be separated by divorce. Following the equivalent line of thinking that same sex marriage ought to be unlawful in light of the fact that it isn’t religiously right would likewise persuade that heterosexual separation between man and woman ought to be illegal. There is nowhere written about homosexuality in the Holy Bible and Jesus has never mentioned anything about it. To choose and pick which laws of the Bible ought to be upheld and which shouldn’t invalidate the point of referencing the Holy Bible. Unless if heterosexual people are happy to surrender the privilege to divorce, same sex marriage ought to be legitimate. Moreover, religion should have no impact upon government rules and laws. This country requires a separation of the state and the church, and to enable religion to be a central factor in a government law isn’t just unethical but unlawful.

Over the years there has been a significant change in the opinion of same sex marriage. With increased awareness more than half of baby boomers favor gays and lesbians’ marriages. The support has increased by 56% over the last decade. Among individuals who are religiously unaffiliated, a strong dominant part have bolstered same-sex marriage since 2001. Today, 85% of religious “nones” state same-sex couples ought to be permitted to marriage . 66% of Catholics currently support same-sex marriage, and so does the white mainline Protestants (68%). Support for same-sex marriage among black Protestants and white Protestants still remains lower than it is among different religious groups. In recent years, the support of white Protestants have increased from 27% to 35% but the Black Protestants still are against same sex marriage. Today White people support same sex marriage more than the Black people.

It is important to put aside religious issues to see this discussion from a lawful stance. It is also necessary that the government administration recognize the civil union of same sex couples since all residents of the United States are entitled to have equal rights regardless to race, sex or sexual introduction. It is a direct result of this legitimate separation that gay people are denied rights. Segregation isn’t right but the initial phase in rectifying social injustice must be taken soon. The issue of lawful marriage between two individuals of the same sex must be settled currently to stop the segregation that is happening all over the United States of America. Think about a park filled with small children. Kids are playing together, giggling and running, and parents are watching them with a happy mood. A couple of these parents is a same sex couple. The couple is enjoying with the rest of the parents. A small boy keeps running up to the couple, hugs them both, starts talking about his day, holding his parents’ hands, without believing that anything is wrong. This is the thing that legitimizing same sex marriage would do. Legalizing same sex marriage would give the citizens a peaceful society. It would help the economy and also improve America’s regulation across the planet.

Work Cited

  1. Massachusetts: Overview of Legal Issues for Gay Men, Lesbians, Bisexuals and Transgender People. GLAD, 2016
  2. “Changing Attitudes on Gay Marriage.” Pew Research Center’s Religion & Public Life Project, Pew Research Center’s Religion & Public Life Project, 26 June 2017, www.pewforum.org/fact-sheet/changing-attitudes-on-gay-marriage/.

Why People Commit Hate Crimes

When we hear about hate crimes such as the Dylan Roof church shooting and the murder of James Byrd, most of us look for details such as what punishment they received, how the community reacted, and what we can do to prevent such terrible attacks. Although those are important aspects that we should focus on, how many of us question why such a crime was committed and where the hatred came from that drove the individual to act in such a way? It is important to understand why hate crimes are committed including what forces drive individuals to commit hate crimes, who commits them, and the groups that are targeted.

From a young age, we all learn social norms, traditions, and beliefs from those we are closest to and the society in which we were born. However, for many, prejudice and discrimination are taught to us at a young age throughout this learning process. According to social psychologists, young children learn certain prejudices by the age of three or four years old. This occurs before they can even distinguish different groups of people. Every child is exposed to prejudices whether it be through family, friends, or society and the only way for their beliefs to change is to unlearn them. (Ehrlich 2009)

Our writers can help you with any type of essay. For any subject

Order now

The exposure to violence at a young age is also a huge contributor to individuals who commit hate crimes. Many children deal with family violence and physical abuse, and for some, it does not end until they leave home. There has been a dramatic increase in mass shootings over the past twenty years. The cause of this can be the exposure to violence at a young age whether it be through family, abuse, or even media. The American Psychological Association report says that before a child finishes elementary school, they will have witnessed over eight thousand murders on television. (Ehrlich 2009) For many, violence isn’t uncommon and is learned at a very young age, leading to an increased risk of violent behavior in the future.

Economic and social change also play a role in hate crime motives. The 1950’s play an important role because this is when desegregation in schools, the public, and the Civil Rights Movement began to take place. This allowed minorities more opportunities when it came to finding a job and a home. A majority of gay and lesbian individuals came out during this time as well. (Ehrlich 2009)

Many white people during this period felt their way of life and livelihood were threatened due to these demographic changes. These changes also lead to anger and dehumanization of these different groups of people. These feelings may have been fueled from ignorance and fear that the world they knew was beginning to change.

Many hate crimes are committed through the form of murder, assault, rape, and vandalism by an individual alone or a group of individuals. Although those may seem like crimes that occur often and not considered a hate crime, when it is considered a hate crime they have a different motive behind them. Everyday criminals commit crimes for personal gain such as money and objects. Hate crime perpetrators commit crimes motivated by biases. These biases are targeted towards different groups due to their gender, religion, race, and sexual orientation. (Marcovitz 2018)

When it comes to hate crime offenders, a common phrase that they use is that they are not motivated by their hatred towards a group of people but rather their love for “their own kind”. (Ehrlich 2009) The belief that is most common of a hate crime perpetrator is that they are typically white males who are middle aged, come from a financially stable home and have minimal to no criminal charges.

In 2016, the FBI reported that 46% of hate crimes were committed by whites. As for minorities, the percentage of perpetrators were 26% African American and 1% Asian American’s as well as Native American’s and 8% were committed by other races. (Marcovitz 2018)

There is a common belief that hate crime offenders act alone. However, many offenders will form groups known as “Hate Groups”. Offenders will look for others who have the same beliefs and prejudices. It isn’t a difficult task for offenders who think alike to find one another. Many hate groups can be found on the internet, sharing their ideas and hatred. (Marcovitz 2018)

The most well-known hate group is the KKK (Ku Klux Klan). There have been many small groups that have been formed and claim allegiance to the KKK, sharing the same beliefs and symbols. (Marcovitz 2018) The smaller groups include Neo-Nazis and Skinheads who base themselves around the beliefs of Adolf Hitler and the Nazis. The main goal of these hate groups is to spread their message rather than committing crimes that involve assault, harassment, and murder. In fact, no more than 10-15% of hate groups are responsible for hate crimes. (Perry 2012) However, these groups should not be taken lightly, and we should still be concerned with them. They can help motivate offenders and persuade them to go out and commit violent hate crimes.

In 2016, the FBI stated that there were over 6,121 criminal incident reports that were motivated by hate. As a result, 7,615 people were victimized by these hate crimes. (Marcovitz 2018) Not all hate crimes involve physical harm but also aim to inflict emotional harm as well. A commonly targeted group when it comes to hate crimes is the LGBT community.

Many offenders will direct hate crimes towards them because the society and environment they live in suggests that they do not follow social norms and that they are different. This is not uncommon because most hate crime offenders’ anger is fueled by people who don’t fit into their societal norms. (CALCASA 2010) Sexual assaults are some of the most common offenses against someone in the LGBT community. Many offenders will view sexual assaults as “putting them back into their role as feminine women”. Many offenders believe that not just them, but the rest of society views them as a “menace to society” and that when they offend, they are doing a “good deed” and the rest of society will thank them for it. (CALCASA 2010)

It is very common for those in the LGBT community to not report a hate crime against them. A study in Los Angeles conducted by Dr. Edward Dunbar stated that victims of sexual assaults are less likely to report the assault to police because they fear the consequences by the perpetrator. (CALCASA 2010) The also fear that law enforcement will not handle the situation to the best of their abilities and that the legal system is biased against them. Also, it can be difficult to prove that the crime was committed and motivated by bias. When a member of the LGBT community is a victim of a hate crime, the whole community is affected as well. It can cause fear and anxiety in the community which is one of the goals of the offender.

Studies show that hate crimes committed against gay people affect both the individual and the community. It can instill fear in the community and make them feel unsafe, causing psychological damage. A study done by Kansas State University found that “the brutality of hate crimes has consequences for the entire community, not just the victim. It is not an exaggeration to say that bias-motivated attacks function as a form of terrorism, sending a message to all lesbians and gay men that they are not safe if they are visible. Thus, when one does not personally know the victim, hate crimes can threaten the illusion of invulnerability that is so important to one’s daily life”. (Marcovitz 2018) Many same-sex couples claim that they don’t feel safe in public when showing affection due to people possibly harming and harassing them.

In conclusion, there is much more to focus on when it comes to hate crimes. We need to understand why these offenders are filled with such hatred towards a group of people and where it comes from. It’s important to realize that many of us grow up learning different norms and beliefs. Many people are raised in a family and grow up surrounded by people with prejudices as well as violence, making it more likely for hate crimes to occur in the future. It is no exaggeration when hate crimes are referred to as an act of terrorism. Hate crimes don’t just affect the person targeted but the entire community as well. These crimes cause fear and make an entire community worry and question if they will be the next victim. By understanding why hate crimes occur and where some of the hatred comes from, we can prevent future crimes from occurring.

Reference Page

  1. Focusing on Pride (Part 2): Hate Crimes Against Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Survivors of Sexual Assault (pp. 1-24, Rep.). (2010). Sacramento, CA: California Coalition Against Sexual Assault. Retrieved 2010, from https://www.calcasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/LGBT-Part-2-FINAL-UPLOAD-12.29.10.pdf.
  2. Marcovitz, H. (2018). Hate Crimes. San Diego, CA: ReferencePoint Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.ccsu.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=1849609&site=ehost-live&scope=site
  3. Perry, B. (2012). Hate and Bias Crime : A Reader. Hoboken: Routledge. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.ccsu.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=507065&site=ehost-live&scope=site
  4. Ehrlich, H. J. (2009). Hate Crimes and Ethnoviolence : The History, Current Affairs, and Future of Discrimination in America. Boulder, CO: Routledge. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.ccsu.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=267676&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

× How can I help you?