White Privilege 2 The United States can be thought of as the epitome of rags to riches story of success. To many, the United States symbolizes unseen opportunities and chances for a better life. From the time we are in elementary school we are told, “Work hard so you can go to college and be someone in life.” Of course this is certainly possible to achieve, but it is not as easily done for everyone as some people are given substantially more opportunities, particularly if you are white. White privilege insinuates that white is the superior race therefore is worthy of such privilege. It gives power to white people to be able to oppress others, grants them better resources, gives them more leeway in the judicial system, and always works in their favor when stacked against others.
White privilege is an incredibly real topic in society today and one of great importance to understand both past oppressive history and our current day occurrences. White privilege sets societal social standards, creates social stratification, and is in full conjunction with a socialist conflict perspective. American history cannot be told without diving into a list of oppressive periods where colored people were discriminated against in every way imaginable. In the olden days it was things like slavery, segregation, Jim Crow Laws, lynching, or literacy tests to be able to vote. It’s easy to judge those living during those periods and think “How could they possibly have sat there and did nothing?” The reality is that not much has changed since those “olden” days; oppressive forces are still very much at work today.
Our writers can help you with any type of essay. For any subject
Order now
The only thing that has changed is that the oppressive nature of things today are perfectly framed to fit into our current day society to evade being deemed as discriminatory. Some examples of this would include racial profiling, mass incarceration, an overwhelmingly biased judicial system or the ever-increasing gap of resources between whites and colored people. Lots of the ideology behind these discriminatory oppressions White Privilege 3 stem from the experience of white people effectively called white privilege. White privilege is an immensely important topic to truly comprehend racism, disparities between whites and colored, and systematic forms of oppression. In modern-day society it is critical to question what we are told by politicians, American history textbooks, or white people who have never faced any sort of repression.
White privilege is a topic everyone should be exposed to so that all may finally understand the complete story of American history altogether. Besides that, it also helps to relieve some stress of self-depreciating thoughts colored people may have of what they deem to be their personal failures and realize it is also due in part to societal forces at play. Whites are almost always pictured in a positive light and for a change we wanted to shift the attention to colored people who must live through subjugation every day and more times than not are pictured in a negative light. Our purpose with the topic of white privilege is not to attack those who are white but is rather an attempt at explaining how white privilege actively works as a form of racism, discrimination, and oppression. The notion of white being a superior race and race in general are both socially constructed concepts.
You are not biologically “white” or “black” or “brown” in terms of defining it as your race, it is simply the outermost layer of ourselves which reflect a certain color. White privilege is in no way biological but the result of deeply rooted social standards that elevate the status of those with white skin to a superiority and in turn devalue the status of non-whites. The dehumanization to a second class status colored people endure indirectly assigns them a certain role. Tracing back in history, this can be thought of as a master-slave relationship. Today it can be seen as a boss-worker relationship focused on minimum wage workers who tend White Privilege 4 to be brown or black, and a boss who tends to be white. Another example could be a white-colored relationship, in which a black or brown person may feel the need to act a certain way near whites to dismantle any negative preconceptions them may have of them.
Perceived status and roles directly correlate with social stratification of society. Those with a higher status, or on top of the hierarchy will undoubtedly reap more benefits than those of lower status, or near the bottom of the social hierarchy. At the top of the social hierarchy are rich white males, and at the bottom are black or brown females. Rich white males have enough power to influence politicians, policies and laws to their benefit in a vigorous cycle that keeps them on top and everyone else below. On the flip side, black and brown females are paid approximately fifty-seven cents for every dollar a white male would earn. This keeps the gap between those on the bottom and top and works to keep poor people poor. Social stratification can be seen in our communities, schools, hospitals, or anywhere else one might care to look. The specific locations mentioned are almost always certainly guaranteed to be better in a highly white concentrated area.
More specifically, this means whites are getting better education, better healthcare, safer communities, and more access to essential resources all at the cost of keeping black and brown people at the bottom of the social hierarchy. Thinking about it through a sociological perspective, the most obvious that easily relates to the issues of white privilege is socialist conflict theory. All of the aforementioned things are prime examples of how status, class, and race affect the opportunities of success in our society; it also indicates how those with white privilege serve to maintain their power while completely turning a blind eye to the struggles of others. One of the most recent examples comes from two words every American has become far too accustomed to hearing: mass shootings.
Historically, mass shootings are mostly carried out by white males, and White Privilege 5 typically these cynical people are referred to as “gunman” “orphan” or “mentally ill.” Had the person committing the crime been anything but a white male, the media would have been immediate to call him “terrorist” or “scrupulous” and evoke fear in the mind of every American. The real plot-twist is that a black man unarmed is more likely to be killed than a mass shooter due to his white skin. Typical cases of mass shooters plead the case of insanity and get life in prison rather than a death sentence, whereas a black man will get life in prison for something minor.
White privilege allows a “blanket” of security for the white man in the judicial system because he is seen as less of a threat than a perceived deviant black man. Our social standards are based on what white people and their predecessors have set in place. For example, the ideal beauty in America is considered to be a young thin girl, with straight blonde hair, pale skin, and blue eyes. These types of girls are seen in lots of American movies, shows, and even toys or dolls. While some may deem this harmless, it is actually harmful to other young colored girls who see this. These movies or shows serve as an agent of socialization that can result in young girls starting to dislike themselves for not being “pretty” like the girls they so oftenly see portrayed. This in itself exhibits the extent to which white privilege (white being the ideal beauty standard) affects people, even young children.
Gun Control Is Oppression
The discussion on weapon control and the importance and ramifications of the second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution is questionable and inciting. Ik-Whan G. Kwon expressed in their examination that there are at present 20,000 laws and directions in the U.S. that endeavor to contain the utilization of guns however sadly this has not meant a decrease in firearm viciousness. In 1992, passings from weapon brutality nearly contacted 40,000 individuals. Singh expressed in his investigation that open weight for weapon control has been produced by expansive increments in the dimensions of vicious wrongdoing. Various shootings in America because of these dangerous guns: Vizzard qualitative study uses mass shootings as its framework to discuss the future of gun control policies in the U.S.
He starts his article by asserting that,“Despite the mass shootings at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado; Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, Virginia; a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado; Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut; and the attempted assassination of U.S. Representative Gabrielle Giffords and accompanying mass shooting in Tucson, Arizona, no gun control legislation has passed either house of Congress since the sunsetting of the assault weapons ban”. This is a powerful indictment to state in the beginning of his study. As mentioned earlier in this literature review, Vizzard does not believe gun control legislation will pass at the federal level until the next time reapportionment occurs but notes that a few state legislatures have been far more active.
Our writers can help you with any type of essay. For any subject
Order now
He asserted that given the limited options for gun control in the U.S., advocates must focus on limited, pragmatic goals that include reducing gun possession and carrying by high-risk individuals, restricting access to firearms by prohibited persons, and utilizing firearms laws to incapacitate violent, career offenders. Vizzard discussed the narrative that scholars such as Lott and Kleck have created in the discussion of gun control, the crime narrative. They have argued that firearms are used as many as 2.5 million times per year to defend against crime. They based their conclusions on random telephone surveys that asked about the defensive use of guns. Vizzard pointed out that the Bureau of Justice Statistics’ National Crime Victims Survey (NCVS) produced an estimate closer to 70,000. As much as Lott’s and Kleck’s work stand out from the rest of the scholarship on gun control, Lott’s work has been widely read and his thesis is regularly appraised, even by legislators.
Right to bear arms Are Firearms a benefit, or a right? With the rising firearm wrongdoings, the discussion of gun control laws faces contentions on the two sides that question whether weapon control laws benefit ruin the United States. The warring sides contend over the perils required with guns along with the advantages of weapons and how firearm control laws just exacerbate the situation. Despite any counter-contentions, more reasons recommend that the United States government should not organize stricter weapon control laws in America. Most significantly, firearm control laws imperil the lives of blameless American citizens.
The establishment of weapon laws may diminish the number of weapons conveyed in America, yet only serves to remove the firearms from the hands of honest individuals. As much as the government does not have any desire to trust it, an illicit weapon advertises will in every case counter their endeavors to eradicate firearms. With enough money related motivating force, any unregulated market will discover a way to obtain unlawful things, for example, weapons. So if the hoodlums can, in any case, discover methods for getting guns, these laws just demonstrate to ‘limit legit firearm authorities’.what’s more, make them targets for gun-toting culprits. Fanning out from that subject, the end of firearms does not lead to the end of savagery related with weapons. A man does not choose to murder someone on the grounds that they happen to have a weapon lying around.
The criminal purpose drives people to murder, and they will discover any way to accomplish them, regardless of whether it includes weapons or not. Since a great many people’s worry with weapons roots from the savagery related mind h them, many regularly contrast America with Australia and the United Kingdom since these two countries have initiated against weapon estimates which have apparently affirmed effective in minimizing crime rates. The blemish in their thinking, in any case, lies in the way that both of draconian enemy of- weapon measures’ (Aborn). On an alternate note, Switzerland requires every adult male to keep a military issued rifle in his home. Strangely enough, Switzerland has one of the world’s most reduced wrongdoing rates.
Many say that the Swiss can pull this off ‘since they’re Swiss, implying that their resilience and low wrongdoing rates originate from their national character as a nation, not as a result of some firearm restriction. Therefore, the issue does not lie with the presence of weapons, yet rather the vicious intent of America as a country. This point just affirms that the violence related to weapons ‘is a reflection of our America’s culture, not firearms’ (singh). Additionally, Guns give a self-preservation to the nationals of America. Mass weapon shootings happen for the most part at schools or malls because the shooter realizes that no doubt nobody in those spots will have a firearm to retaliate and shoot them. Studies demonstrate that if a criminal realizes that any given individual might hold a disguised firearm, the wrongdoing and murder rates will exponentially diminish. Guns, at last, really help protect residents as opposed to prevalent thinking, and unnecessary confinements on them will just place the blameless in the line of danger.
Furthermore, Gun control prompts an increasingly communist or revolutionary society. These laws permit the administration much more control over the subjects and at last lead the nation to transform into the kind of government in which numerous individuals endure in more routes than one. Many events in history with respect to the confinement or restriction of guns have driven many governmental bodies to get ugly. Russia, Germany, and China model prime instances of these events. China had a gun prohibition for quite a while when executive Mao Tse-tung came into power. Trusting that power originated from the barrels of weapons, he gathered the firearms so that the government possessed the capability instead of the subjects .
This sounds like the circumstance happening here in America presently. The preclusion of weapons in China, however, led to a great many helpless individuals passing on unnecessarily from expanded wrongdoing. The significance of these models comes from the way that these legislatures had socialist ideas that at last prompted the setback of their kin. It appears to be truly plausible that America could tumble to this example of oppression and spread sentiments of despise towards the government. Branching off from that subject, the limitation of weapon laws likewise abuses and strays away from what the country established its standards upon. Numerous contentions concentrating on the Constitution and the privilege to carry weapons state that the Second Amendment was passed to secure sports shooting or hunting.
Since the First Amendment does not just ‘exist to protect Shakespeare or the Beatles’ (borne), then this contention about the Second Amendment invalidates itself. The organizers of America made this country from the craving to escape the oppression that these weapon control laws bring. In the event that the country pivots and walks right back into that mistreatment, the endeavors to frame this country have gone to squander. Firearms unite people together and Guns possessing the general population is the image of vote based system, or one of the images, in any event, that incorporates America with the incredible nation people know today. Finally, weapon control laws add to a coming up short economy. Everybody knows that economic circumstance in America can’t wait for any longer on the off chance that it props up downhill.
Though it may not appear it, firearms really encourage the economy. Nobody understands the impact that weapons have on the economy. Hidden weapons add to a decrease in vicious wrongdoing which considers a financial gain of 6.6 billion, contrasted with a financial loss of 417 million because of increment in property wrongdoings. The determined net increase still sums to 6.2 billion dollars, which nobody can truly gripe about. The reserve funds here will disappear if the stricter weapon control laws get affirmed by the legislature. Also, over the recent years, because of expanding neurosis and a potentially unnecessary worry for safety, many natives have purchased a weapon. The lion’s share of individuals expects that when somebody buys a weapon, they plan to utilize it to go out and shooting somebody when truly, the vast majority purchase firearms as a technique for self-preservation and mental security.
Various women have really purchased a firearm in opposition to the conviction that ladies typically don’t convey a gun. In the event that the stricter laws make it harder for ladies and all like to acquire a firearm, at that point the undeniable impact of dropping weapon deals will result. Since gun sales have as of late gone up, the sputter in the stream of offers will put a major imprint in the market and clearly cause the market to drop to an extraordinary failure. The administration benefits from the many taxes that they put on the offer of firearms, the grants for weapons, and the permit for weapons. The profit from these various sources will drop or even vanish if the administration institute these new weapon laws. Thus, the legislature will have no real option except to charge other items that don’t require burdening.
With all the fussing about duties these days, nobody needs any more needless charges to fix up government money related issues and slip-ups. This occurrence will just lead to a feeling of disdain in the administration disbanding the solidarity of America. This country does not require progressively sparing tears and government slip-ups to tear it apart. These reasons bolster that the United States government ought not to institute stricter firearm control laws in America. Subjects should wake up from their obliviousness and spread the word to enable America to understand the damage these firearm control laws bring. Not just do these weapon control laws remove firearms from the hands of good individuals, however, they likewise put them into the hands of the general population with sick aims. Any individual who understands this should rally and make their voice heard to keep such obliteration from occurring.
