Table of Contents
Introduction Discussion chapter Conclusion Bibliography
Introduction
Teamwork is one of the most essential factors influencing the performance and profitability of modern businesses. Teams are crucial to the success of any firm. Critics say that for a successful performance, team members must collaborate to accomplish the project's overall objectives. In many organizations, work statements are closely related to plans, which can be characterized as a declaration of purpose and must be held by the project's owners. Even on a single project, it is the planner's responsibility to understand and document the team's thoughts. It is not the planner's responsibility to decide and dictate what individuals should do. This places the quality policy at the apex of the pyramid because there is likely just one policy, which may be contained in a quality manual. Each phase begins with a collection of data and concludes with a collection of deliverables. At the conclusion of each phase, there is a ‘gateway’ through which the project can only continue if the necessary approvals are obtained. The team selected for study is a real team employed by Hitachi Group, a pharmaceutical firm. The team is primarily responsible for regulating product quality and introducing cost-effective enhancements and solutions to existing items.
Discussion chapter
Teams are defined by LaFasto and Larson (2001) as "unique types of groups… composed of members who are not only technically competent but also skilled at collaborating with one another to achieve their common goal" (p. 4). In a pharmaceutical corporation, functional departments and workers are integrated mostly through teams. The team members agree to accept the project manager's authority for the length of the project. It is noteworthy to note that the team includes more "senior" members than the project manager. Currently, conventional vertical authority connections have shifted, and day-to-day workplace issues may require agreement or negotiation. Therefore, it is essential that communications be basic, simple, and easily understood, without insulting the intelligence of individual or institutional investors. Both the company and its shareholders face a similar problem; both must learn what is required to fully comprehend the issues being debated, the company from the perspective of communicating the issues and the stockholder from the perspective of comprehending the advantages and disadvantages of competing, complex, and frequently persuasive arguments (Belbin, 2006).
According to Scholtes et al. (2003), the key stages of team development include formation, integration of new members, norming, and performance. Each of these phases is essential for success since it establishes the objectives and course of development. The hierarchy will stretch upwards from the functional manager to the board of directors. Alongside this portion of the hierarchy will be a separate hierarchy for the project management team. Program managers must supervise project managers, who may include phase managers, planners, and other project-related engineers, to ensure efficient work (Scholtes et al, 2003). For instance, when confronted with the possibility of transitioning to a team-based work environment, several U.S. employees expressed worries that represented their individualistic ideals. As temporary team structures, multicultural teams, and virtual teams expand, these team-savvy professionals will be able to lead their enterprises in the successful deployment and utilization of teams in international contexts (Carr, 2002).
To counter these possible obstacles, human resource professionals should support the sharing of practices inside and between businesses, observe and adapt to organizational environmental trends, and keep a heightened awareness of cultural convergence. Ahead-of-the-curve trends in the utilization of teams will be more manageable for human resource professionals who are competent at adjusting fundamental HR procedures and can adapt their assumptions (Scholtes et al, 2003). Effective communication is essential for enhancing employees' knowledge of the value of their contribution to the organization's success and for establishing a dialogue with their managers that can boost employees' contributions. Change and organizational transformation are unlikely to occur if the performance management system does not incorporate new values. Senior management's declarations are insufficient to drive the new behaviors required for cultural transformation; rather, these behaviors must be woven into the fabric of performance and everyday efforts and priorities. Thus, if an organization's objective is to boost worker participation, its computer applications cannot be neglected (Cleland, 1996). They can enhance or impede information sharing and interaction inside an organization, so facilitating or inhibiting the growth and maintenance of worker engagement.
Effective communication is the foundation of teamwork and performance management, fusing all elements of organizational success into a single, aligned process that directs employee performance toward the same organizational goals and reinforces and maintains this alignment through reward and recognition programs. In a highly competitive business environment, businesses' chances of success can be enhanced if the full potential of this technology can be tapped and utilized. "clarity in team goals, a plan for improvement, clearly defined roles, clear communication, beneficial team behaviors, balanced participation, and awareness of group processes" are the top recommendations for effective teamwork (Scholtes et al , 2003, p. 6-10).
Each team should establish a combination of outcome- and process-oriented measurements as essential performance indicators. Process measures reveal crucial team behaviors that can be altered to improve results. Teams should avoid creating an excessive number of measurements. If a metric is not essential for guiding the team's conduct, it should be discarded. Most experts advise that teams monitor six to ten performance indicators (Cordery, 2005). In team-based companies, individuals are accountable for several levels of collective performance. The performance of individuals, teams, and business units must be reviewed. Optimizing performance at a single level may have detrimental effects on performance at other levels. The relationship between conduct at one level and performance at a different one may be tenuous. People frequently worry that they will not receive appropriate performance feedback when the emphasis is on communal performance. Therefore, evaluation systems should evaluate actions that contribute to the performance of other organizational units or levels. Control and coordination are required for task performance (Cleland, 1996). The author writes, "An advantage of the earned value method is that we are not limited to a global overview of the project. Analysis of the budget and schedule can occur at any level of the work breakdown hierarchy (LaFasto and Larsen, 2001, p. 54).
The greatest obstacles for the team will be autonomous thought and decision making. Managers manage problems, plan and assign tasks, and deal with personnel issues such as absence and discipline. All of these responsibilities were formerly the purview of management. For the team to be effective, it must now have the responsibility and authority to implement solutions. At every level of the business, from the executive suite to the mailroom, a compelling vision is required. A properly communicated vision provides this function and communicates the need for change. This need is typically greater than the organization and is something the person can accommodate. Every organization has an external goal that individuals can commit to and that is essential to the organization's survival (Cleland, 1996).
The majority of team members should focus on the overall business strategy while ignoring minute specifics. Additionally, transformational leadership is based on change, yet the majority of people reject and dread continuous change. Thus, the major problem is the capacity to concentrate on goals and the challenges surrounding them. If team members accept one another's expertise, the majority of personality conflicts will resolve themselves. Moreover, the more time a team devotes to interpersonal relationships, the less efficient it gets. There is an inverse relationship between the time spent on "people problems" and the effectiveness of a team. This will result in team members responding to feedback with commitment to team objectives, interest in the team task, and attraction to the team (Cordery, 2005). There may be one team member to whom no one has ever provided input. This employee's feedback and request for assistance in embodying the team's ideals is a momentous event for the team. It would be clearly risky to permit inexperienced personnel to serve as their primary source of feedback. Interfering practices between reaction and delayed feedback, which are highly probable in the workplace, might hinder progress. However, stockholders must rely on communications they get from both sides of the argument, as well as commercials, newspaper articles, and analyst reports. In addition, the stockholder is hampered by the sheer volume of information received from both parties when terms and conditions change or materially important facts become available (Gratton and Erickson, 2007).
Effective executives that define lucid goals for the entire organization are essential to the industry. At Hitachi, where decision-making and problem-solving skills have contributed to their success, managers gladly assume responsibility for the problems of others and return them with ready-made answers. In fact, the reason why great managers attain authority in the first place is because they accept responsibility and resolve issues with such composure. Managers are rarely promoted for providing the necessary leadership for adaptable work. Management acquires performance commitment through contractual arrangements, whereas leadership gains commitment through empowerment. As the business world has become more conscious of these discrepancies, more and more resources have been devoted to leadership training and education (LaFasto and Larsen, 2001).
Management can be viewed as an organization that pays record remuneration to attract the brightest and most talented executives to guide them through the volatile business environment of the present day. Many boards and executive recruiters believe that an exceptional group of persons possesses leadership skills with nearly universal applicability. With the understanding that firms long seen as paragons of managerial performance were faltering in the face of significant competitive difficulties, many began to assume that the two professions required distinct sets of skills. It was possible for a business to be well-managed yet poorly led. In prosperous times, a well-managed business may experience considerable success. Adopting a marketing (diversity-based) perspective, it appears futile to argue that research should be structured to give analytic knowledge or intuitive information. Every staff member should feel that they are an integral part of the team, accepting the beliefs and customs of the publishing industry. It is essential to differentiate between aim and style of implementation, as only actions have an impact on organizational performance and its successful planning (Teale, 2003). Their only shared characteristic is their professional expertise, which enables them to ensure that the objective is well-defined and that high performance standards are established. The manner in which objectives and expectations are formed is a matter of style, but establishing them is a matter of performance and favorable outcomes. Individuals who wish to develop their leadership abilities should consider situational elements and decision outcomes (LaFasto and Larsen, 2001).
Conclusion
In conclusion, effective and successful teams prioritize team-goal-related concerns. Both relate to the way a leader leads a team and bring focus to the work at hand, yet they differ in very particular ways. Combining individual strengths entails influencing as opposed to commanding. Influencing demands a distinct skill set than hierarchical management, in which direction is the norm. One of the most effective ways a leader may exert influence is by setting a good example. Leaders and managers can implement training and education programs to ensure the professionalism of their employees. This method will assist managers in fostering a positive organizational culture and environment. With this information, a team leader can transfer responsibility more readily in order to create budget-friendly strategies that are effective.
References
Belbin R (2006). Team Roles at Work, Butterworth-Heinemann, UK
Carr C (2002). Teamwork: Lessons from America's leading corporations on putting teamwork to work. Prentice Hall of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
The phrase Cleland D. I. (1996). Strategic Management of Teams, published in the United States by John Wiley and Sons.
Cordery, J., "Teamwork," in Holman, D., Wall, T.D., Clegg, C.W., Sparrow, and A. (2005). The Fundamentals of the Modern Workplace John Wiley and Sons, United Kingdom,
L. Gratton and T. J. Erickson (2007). Harvard Business Review, November, pages. 101-109, 8 techniques to establish collaborative teams
LaFasto, F., Larsen, C. (2001). When teams work most effectively. Publications by Sage.
Scholtes, P. R. Joiner, B. L., Streibe, B. J. (2003). (2003). Third edition of The Team Handbook. The third edition of Joiner/Oriel Inc.
Management Decision Making, by M. Teale, Financial Times Prentice Hall, London, UK, 2003.
[supanova question]