Is same-sex marriage right? There are many controversial viewpoints regarding same-sex marriage. While some individuals believe that it is not traditional or “normal,” there is an array of folks who advocate for same-sex marriage, asserting that love should be fluid and without societal constraints. Even though these proponents believe in a blind love free from prejudice, they recognize that some societal norms lean more towards traditional couplings of a woman and a man. The main argument against same-sex marriage is that such couples can’t naturally produce offspring. While optioms like surrogacy or in-vitro fertilization (IVF) are often explored, critics argue that children ought to grow up with their biological parents. Additionally, from a religious perspective, same-sex marriage could contradict various faiths’ beliefs. Analysts have suggested that same-sex parenting could also cause confusion or social and emotional challenges for a child, potentially leading to gender or sexual disorders [Judith,Stacey]. Consequently, some argue that same-sex marriage should not be legal.
The primary argument involves children needing their biological parents. For same-sex couples, surrogacy or in-vitro fertilization (IVF) becomes the choice for parenthood [Kyle,Pruett]. A study by the Yale Child Study Center revealed that children conceived through IVF often have a lot of questions about their biological parents that could lead to feelings of sadness and abandonment [Kyle,Pruett]. Critics argue that every child has a fundamental connection with its mother from infancy and can intuitively recognize when their biological mother is not present. The central idea behind a traditional marriage, they argue, is to start a family naturally without need for external medical help. Therefore, critics believe same-sex marriage should not exist if the involved entities can’t produce children naturally.
Our writers can help you with any type of essay. For any subject
Order now
Another bone of contention is adoption by same-sex couples. Even though it provides homes to children who are desperately in need of families, critics argue that these children ought to be raised in traditional mother-father households. The reality of being raised by a same-sex couple, as opposed to the expectations of a conventional family, could potentially lead to social and emotional challenges for the child in the future. These problems could escalate when the child starts attending school; potentially feeling left out upon observing their peers’ traditional families. A study conducted by the University of Texas revealed that “young-adult children (ages 18-39) of parents with same-sex partnerships before the children reached 18 were more likely to confront a variety of emotional and social problems.” This can potentially confuse the child as they grow, presenting them with further challenges when relating to their same-sex parents.
Many children may feel as though bringing home a partner of the opposite sex is an affront to their same-sex parents. These children might even fear rejection from their partner due to their parents’ sexual orientation, even if that fear is unwarranted. It might also compel them to hesitate in discussing their questions and concerns with their parents, akin to how a child might struggle to come out as gay or bisexual to their heterosexual parents. While this issue may not be prevalent among all children of same-sex parents, it does affect a substantial proportion. A 2013 study revealed that children of married, opposite-sex parents have higher graduation rates compared to other groups. Conversely, children of lesbian couples had notably lower graduation rates. This suggests the potential for academic or personality issues to develop in these children. The study also found that sons of lesbian mothers are typically less masculine, while the daughters are more masculine[Judith, Stacey and Timothy Biblarz]. This could indicate that having same-sex parents may negatively impact children in some cases.
Another point of contention is the assertion that all children need both a mother and a father. Heather Berwick, a woman raised by a lesbian couple, has openly discussed how the absence of a father figure negatively affected her upbringing. Each parent plays a distinctive role: a mother is often the one providing emotional nourishment and reassurance, while a father usually offers structure and discipline. This dual input is vital for robust childhood development and the acquisition of life skills. When children have two mothers or two fathers, they may miss out on the unique influences of either a mother or a father. If same-sex marriage becomes more prevalent, which could lead to a surge in the number of children being raised without a father, as the number of lesbian couples would likely rise. There are several studies suggesting that same-sex marriages are less successful than opposite-sex marriages. Additionally, a father’s presence in a household often provides a sense of security for children. Intriguingly, research has shown that girls who grow up without a biological father tend to reach puberty earlier and have higher rates of teen pregnancy. Therefore, these findings suggest that same-sex marriages could potentially cause complications for children.
The third argument against same-sex marriages suggests that such unions oppose the word of God and contravene the beliefs of several religious groups[Should gay…]. Christians believe that marriage should be oriented solely towards producing and raising children[Should gay…]. Throughout scripture, it has been stated, “it is clear that marriage is a lifelong, exclusive, covenantal union of two people- a husband and a wife- which forms the foundation for family”[Keaton, Halley]. Many believe that God created man and woman to procreate and populate the earth, not for male-and-male or female-and-female combinations. In the Bible, it states, “Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind; it is abomination”; thus condemning homosexual relationships. In Islam, passages condemn gay and lesbian relationships; one saying being, ‘When a man mounts another man, the throne of God shakes'[Keaton]. Not only do Christianity and Islam oppose same-sex relationships, but two orthodox Jewish groups, the Orthodox Agudath Israel of America and the Orthodox Union, are also against gay marriage. Some people also argue that their tax money should not be used towards something they don’t believe in. Peter S. Spring posits that, if gay marriage was legalized, taxpayers, consumers, and businesses would be forced to subsidize homosexual relationships. Some suggest the government only legalized marriage to financially benefit federal, state, and local governments, thereby just boosting the economy. They assert that gay marriage was not legalized because it is morally right but because of the monetary benefits associated with it[Should gay…].
In conclusion, gay marriage should not be made legal in the United States. The first reason being every child needs their biological parents. However, if they are in a foster home, they should ideally be placed in a traditional mother and father household. Same-sex couples should not resort to surrogate mothers or in-vitro fertilization (IVF). Opposite-sex couples can produce a child naturally, which speaks volumes about the normative order. Artificial or surgical means to have children oppose natural laws. Same-sex marriages can cause social and emotional problems in children. It can lead to confusion regarding what is right and wrong when it comes to selecting their partners as they grow older. The uncertainty experienced by a homosexual person revealing their sexuality to their heterosexual parents could be the same for children with same-sex parents, just vice versa. The second reason against same-sex relationships is that children need one mother and one father, not two mothers or two fathers. Every child should be raised in a traditional opposite-sex parent home. Both parents collectively lend something integral to every child’s development: a mother, emotional support, and a father, protection and discipline, which are essential. The final argument insists that it contradicts several religious groups’ beliefs. Numerous passages in religious texts stand against same-sex relations. Therefore, same-sex marriages should not be legalized in the United States due to the social and emotional problems they can induce in children, the necessity for children to have their biological parents, and the contravention of several religious groups’ doctrines.
Community Attitudes Of Down Syndrome Between Past And Present
Down syndrome is a congenital disorder which emerge from defects of chromosomes leading to physical abnormalities and intellectual impairment not to mention broad facial and short stature profile. Van Riper and Pridham (2002) denoted that Down syndrome could be an inherited disorder caused once abnormal biological process ends up in an additional full or partial copy of body chromosomes. This further genetic material causes the biological process changes and physical options of Down syndrome.In the past, different communities handled cases of the Down syndrome differently, some communities would usually resolve the issue through elimination of the affected (Van Riper and Pridham, 2002). Others would subjected the affected individuals to imprisonment, torture and beating. These actions made these people develop inferiority complex that lead to a stressful life. They had believed that they were not complete members of the society and their interaction with other would contribute to more similar cases of Down syndrome.
Some community believed that individuals with Down syndrome were cursed by the ancestors and their existence would contribute to no good. This believe stimulate their motive to eliminate them from the society.Technological advancement contribute to gaining of knowledge. Societies have learnt that individuals with down syndrome are part of the society despite their misfortunes (Light and McNaughton, 2012). They have all right to live as they desire. Medical expert have played their role in advocating for the proper handling of the Down syndrome individuals. Various communities have managed to develop ministries that cater for their needs. Campaigning for equality among members of the community seem to impact great change different communities. Communities have recognized that Down syndrome is a disease that requires attention from the medical experts.
Our writers can help you with any type of essay. For any subject
Order now
According to Alderson (2001), the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is a stage prompting constructive change, however much work stays to be finished. Instructive practice and opportunity regularly shifts between suppliers purportedly working inside a typical legitimate and instructive framework. Obstructive and impartial institutional nonchalance for the rights and needs of the individuals with Down syndrome might be on the decrease, yet it is still excessively normal and remains a reason for brought down instructive results for individuals with Down syndrome and tension and misery for their families (Buckley et al.,2006).
The abilities, skill and assets important to legitimately bolster the instruction of individuals with handicaps are frequently hard to come by in the present training frameworks. Consequently, our comprehension of exactly what constitutes a top notch instructive experience for individuals with Down syndrome is in no way, shape or form attractive. The paper focuses on community attitudes of Down syndrome between the past and present through how to dealing with people with Down syndrome, their treatment methods, and incorporating Down syndrome in the society.
Dealing with people with Down syndrome
Down syndrome (DS) is one in every of the foremost common uninheritable disorders related to intellectual incapacity and social stigma. Community attitudes and data of this condition are necessary for inclusion of individuals with DS into the community and up their quality of lives. Results of surveys from the globe showed that societies still hold negative attitudes towards inclusion of individuals with DS. According to Ouellette’ Kuntz (2005), individuals with DS typically have reduced life and suffer from sub normality, heart issues, Alzheimer’s illness among different complications. Fernandez (2007) denote that a significant number of the medical problems in the societies concerning Down syndrome contribute to lots of worries and should be checked regularly.
Strikingly, there are new issues which should be considered and, on the grounds that individuals with Down syndrome are living longer, issues are developing which were beforehand once in a while experienced or are currently being observed and researched surprisingly. For instance, the issue of Down syndrome and ageing has brought up issues about connections with Alzheimer’s malady. However, it is presently realized that individuals with Down syndrome, although maturing, don’t really build up Alzheimer’s illness or different states of dementia. Besides, individuals with Down syndrome are inclined to states of hypothyroidism, which may regularly go unnoticed. Various people with Down syndrome are as yet found to experience the ill effects of hypothyroidism, having been undiscovered for a long time. Hall and Minnes (2003) articulated that the connection amongst emotional and physical wellbeing should be unmistakably perceived, by experts and family, as well as by the person.
People may require guide direction to enable them to comprehend why they feel as they do. Issues identifying with weight, nourishment, and appearance may likewise effect on physical and enthusiastic prosperity. Heftiness, which is a typical medical issue for people with Down syndrome, should be checked for physical wellbeing reasons as well as for mental prosperity (OuelletteKuntz, 2005). Keeping up an adjusted eating routine and interest in physical exercise can help enhance wellbeing and physical appearance and this, thus, can enhance social acknowledgment in the group and general inspiration. Individual aspects such as cleanliness, preparing and dressing are factors for thought in enhancing appearance, confidence and mental prosperity. Sexual wellbeing and prosperity are likewise imperative parts of life, which can add to general prosperity. Supernumerary, familiarity with sexual needs with regards to proper conduct is important.
Training should begin in the early years and, as development happens, not exclusively should the issues of sexuality be introduced, however customize inside the setting of typical advancement with a consciousness of wellbeing, social and individual needs and difficulties. Sexual wellbeing and prosperity ought to be instructed inside the setting of group desires and family sensitivities. It ought to likewise be perceived that numbness of sexuality and satisfactory and non-adequate conduct is not gainful. Planning for a sexual grown-up life, with its positive encounters and additionally the conceivable dangers, ought to be embraced inside the system of solid improvement and regard for oneself. Contraception, the privilege to security, the capacity to shield oneself from abuse also manage the difficulties set by potential sexual ailments, for example, HIV, can be comprehended by numerous, especially in a solid and visual configuration. Instructing ought to include concrete and visual cases with demonstrating of suitable practices using movement training gatherings, utilizing show methods and advising (Buckley et al., 2006).
Vision and hearing, which can regularly be weakened in people with Down syndrome, should keep on being surveyed and revised through adulthood. Podiatry has likewise been appeared to be compelling, and the creator found the show work did via Carl Parsons in Australia for people with Down syndrome to be a great and valuable illustration. The connection between wellbeing experts and people with Down syndrome is critical (Torrado et al., 2011). For instance, it might be troublesome for a general restorative professional to comprehend a man with Down syndrome due to discourse issues, however it is essential, regardless of the possibility that they require help to comprehend the individual’s discourse, that they continue attempting to comprehend and that they generally clarify their activities and suggestions to that individual.
Some of this should be possible outwardly through pictures and drawings. It is imperative that restorative professionals indicate people what is going on in and to their bodies. Individuals with Down syndrome, specifically, comprehend much more than they can unmistakably verbalized. To disregard them, or talk principally to the individual who is going with them, when they can truly comprehend, is a hit to confidence similarly as when any of us is overlooked, or thought to be befuddled or unfit to grasp.
Treatment methods of Down syndrome
Presently, there are various therapies and programmes introduced to facilitate development and promotion of personal life. The interventions contribute to productivity and independence contrary to the past mechanism applied which involved destruction. Some of the therapies incorporated include physical therapy, speech language therapy, occupational therapy, behavioural and emotional therapy, drug and supplements, assistive devices as well as Down syndrome registry. These achievements are contrary to the past since all activities undertaken were subject to intimidation and elimination.
Notably, physical activities inculcated exercises and activities which aided in building of the skills, balance and posture improvement as well as increasing the muscle strength. Speech language therapy helped the Down syndrome child apply their language more effectively contributing to advancement in communication skills. Occupational therapy aided in finding the mechanisms to cope with dairy chores which match their abilities and needs. Attributively, behavioural and emotional therapy anticipate to come up with useful responses both undesirable and desirable behaviours. Drug and supplements subject some individuals to intake of the drug or amino acid which alters the functioning of the brain. Nonetheless, some the drugs led to adverse condition and therefore more effective psychoactive drugs were developed which were safe and more effective. Assistive device such as amplification devices are used to enhance learning for the individuals with healing challenges. Support is a basically essential process given to individuals with Down syndrome and this happens continuously.
In a perfect world, support is a procedure which intends to speak to the person’s desires and needs and ‘takes care of’ the person’s advantages (Uyanik et al., 2003). As a procedure, it perceives that now and again guardians and experts have predispositions and loyalties which strife with the interests of the person. Taking care of business, backing is an empowering and steady process, helping other people to welcome the person’s viewpoint, and supporting gatherings to empower the individual to accomplish what they need or wish to achieve. It ought not turn into an angry procedure and this is the place the ability of the supporter comes in. Promotion might be required in circumstances where care or bolster specialists perceive a person’s needs yet can’t meet them because of the directions of an association, or the dug in and infrequently dated perspectives of a ranking staff member (Hall and Minnes, 2003).
Moreover, it might be useful in speaking to the perspectives of a person who wishes to live in the group and can do as such. Notably, encouragement is a gifted procedure directed by realities and proof with regards to a person’s desires and decisions (Klusmann 2008). It includes directing of the gatherings required, with an unmistakable understanding that the person’s supporter is there to help that individual. Promotion ought to be a vital part for all experts who ought to perceive a portion of the individual and family issues. Basically, experts morally advocate for individuals with Down syndrome. Promotion is provided and involve giving individuals proper and typical chances to develop and encounter. For instance, advocates enable bosses to comprehend the part that individuals with Down syndrome can play in the work constrain.
Incorporating Down syndrome within the society
In the past, many people with Down syndrome did not have the chance to develop to their full potential. Often, they need been separated from the remainder of the community, living in separate settings like care establishments. Low expectations were placed on them and there have been restricted opportunities for learning and private growth. Nowadays we tend to recognize that growing up in families and communities, with constant rights and responsibilities as everybody else, is significant to the event of individuals with Down syndrome. To be a section of a community you’ve got to be in it.
This suggests that individuals who have solely fully fledged life during a separate setting might realize it tough to be enclosed within the general community. Life for those who age being enclosed in families and communities are terribly completely different than it’s been for those that have invariably lived in care facilities. According to the present encounters, encouraging people with Down syndrome to travel to a faculty with their peers from their community have been adopted and have several advantages. It opens the approach for a sleek transition to adulthood and encourages significant inclusion within the community. Individuals with Down syndrome want opportunities to succeed in their full potential, like we tend to all do (Cunningham et al., 2008). Once given these opportunities, they become valued and productive members of their families and therefore the community. One of the best challenges that individual’s with Down syndrome face is that the attitudes of people who don’t perceive what it means that to possess down syndrome.
Despite a lot of amendment, many individual’s still do not see the individual person. Instead they merely see ‘Down syndrome’ and expect everybody with Down syndrome to be additional or less constant. Individuals with Down syndrome are terribly completely different from one another, even as we tend to are all completely different. Everybody with Down syndrome is exclusive, with their own abilities, abilities, thoughts and interests. Not all individuals with Down syndrome may try or accomplish all levels of incorporation, nevertheless, all people require consolation and openings in regions of entertainment and recreation (Cunningham et al., 2008). They are not ornaments but rather crucial exercises, which require facilitate government and group bolster. Exercises should be adjusted. The test is that, every now and again, such exercises for some youngsters don’t start sufficiently early in life. They are something which should start ahead of schedule with a view to later movement and delight. Introduction and opportunity are basic. In addition, a significant number of the exercises of people with Down syndrome are inactive and this tends to increment over the growing-up years.
Conclusion
In conclusion, life has changed for the individuals with Down syndrome in different environment in the world (Van Riper and Pridham, 2002). Enhanced social and instructive open doors and access to educated medicinal services are helping current eras of individuals with Down syndrome to accomplish increasingly and live longer. The families, clinicians, scientists and affiliations that have crusaded and endeavored to convey enhanced open doors over the previous year??™s achieves more credit for this. Additionally, many individuals with Down syndrome who have over and again adapted to present circumstances and shown themselves to be more capable than beforehand.It appears that attitudes are closely connected with specific social environments and social directives and changes with time.
Efforts to alter attitudes can come back to normal if the foundation causes of those attitudes are neglected. Through this analysis method has been realized that the term “attitudes”, that is getting used on everyday basis, is extremely problematical, however extremely vital also for the implementation of integration. Typically attitudes are being treated as existing somewhere at the sub-conscious level of the person, and not as deep internalizations of social norms and cultural components that are taken with no consideration. If one in every of the aims of integration is to figure as a profit and not as an inexpensive different to students’ education, there’s a necessity for more analysis within which the exploration of attitudes wouldn’t be insulated by problems like governmental policies, social group norms, instructional attribute and therefore the individual’s individuation.
References
Alderson, P., 2001. Down’s syndrome: cost, quality and value of life. Social Science & Medicine, 53(5), pp.627-638.Bittles, A.H. and Glasson, E.J., 2004. Clinical, social, and ethical implications of changing life expectancy in Down syndrome. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 46(4), pp.282-286.Buckley, S., Bird, G., Sacks, B. and Archer, T., 2006. A comparison of mainstream and special education for teenagers with Down syndrome: Implications for parents and teachers. Down Syndrome Research and Practice, 9(3), pp.54-67.Cunningham, C.C., Glenn, S., Lorenz, S., Cuckle, P. and Shepperdson, B., 2008. Trends and outcomes in educational placements for children with Down syndrome. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 13(3), pp.225-237.Fernandez, F., Morishita, W., Zuniga, E., Nguyen, J., Blank, M., Malenka, R.C. and Garner, C.C., 2007. Pharmacotherapy for cognitive impairment in a mouse model of Down syndrome. Nature neuroscience, 10(4), pp.411-413.Hall, H. and Minnes, P., 2003. Attitudes toward persons with Down syndrome: The impact of television. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 11(1), pp.61-76.Klusmann, J.H., Creutzig, U., Zimmermann, M., Dworzak, M., Jorch, N., Langebrake, C., Pekrun, A., Macakova-Reinhardt, K. and Reinhardt, D., 2008. Treatment and prognostic impact of transient leukemia in neonates with Down syndrome. Blood, 111(6), pp.2991-2998.Light, J. and McNaughton, D., 2012. The changing face of augmentative and alternative communication: Past, present, and future challenges.Ouellette???Kuntz, H., 2005. Understanding health disparities and inequities faced by individuals with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 18(2), pp.113-121.Petty, H. and Sadler, J., 2006. The integration of children with Down syndrome in mainstream schools: Teachers’ knowledge, needs, attitudes and expectations. Down Syndrome Research and Practice, 4(1), pp.15-24.Torrado, C., Bastian, W., Wisniewski, K.E. and Castells, S., 2011. Treatment of children with Down syndrome and growth retardation with recombinant human growth hormone. The Journal of pediatrics, 119(3), pp.478-483.Uyanik, M., Bumin, G. and Kayihan, H., 2003. Comparison of different therapy approaches in children with Down syndrome.? Pediatrics International,? 45(1), pp.68-73.Van Riper, M., Ryff, C. and Pridham, K., 2002. Parental and family well???being in families of children with down syndrome: A comparative study.? Research in nursing & health,? 15(3), pp.227-235.
